Allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction of the proximal part of the humerus: functional outcome and survivorship
- PMID: 19797576
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00815
Allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction of the proximal part of the humerus: functional outcome and survivorship
Abstract
Background: Limb salvage following resection of a tumor in the proximal part of the humerus poses many challenges. Reconstructive options are limited because of the loss of periarticular soft-tissue stabilizers of the glenohumeral joint in addition to the loss of bone and articular cartilage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome and survival of the reconstruction following use of a humeral allograft-prosthesis composite for limb salvage.
Methods: An allograft-prosthesis composite was used to reconstruct a proximal humeral defect following tumor resection in thirty-six consecutive patients at one institution over a sixteen-year period. The reconstruction was performed at the time of a primary tumor resection in thirty cases, after a failure of a reconstruction following a previous tumor resection in five patients, and following excision of a local recurrence in one patient. The mean duration of follow-up of the living patients was five years. Glenohumeral stability, function, implant survival, fracture rate, and union rate following the reconstructions were measured. Functional outcome and implant survival were analyzed on the basis of the amount of deltoid resection, whether the glenohumeral resection had been extra-articular or intra-articular, and the length of the humerus that had been resected.
Results: One patient sustained a glenohumeral dislocation. Deltoid resection (partial or complete) resulted in a reduced postoperative range of motion in flexion and abduction but had no effect on the mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score. Extra-articular resections were associated with lower Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores. All patients had either mild or no pain and normal hand function at the time of final follow-up. The overall estimated rate of survival of the construct, with revision as the end point, was 88% at ten years. There were three failures due to progressive prosthetic loosening that necessitated removal of the construct. Four patients required an additional bone-grafting procedure to treat a delayed union of the osteosynthesis site.
Conclusions: An allograft-prosthesis composite used for limb salvage following tumor resection in the proximal part of the humerus is a durable construct associated with an acceptable complication rate. Deltoid preservation and intra-articular resection are associated with a greater range of shoulder motion and a superior functional outcome, respectively.
Similar articles
-
Allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction of the proximal part of the humerus: surgical technique.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Sep;92 Suppl 1 Pt 2:188-96. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00167. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010. PMID: 20844174
-
What Is the Implant Survivorship and Functional Outcome After Total Humeral Replacement in Patients with Primary Bone Tumors?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Aug 1;479(8):1754-1764. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001677. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021. PMID: 33595237 Free PMC article.
-
Complications and functional outcomes of reconstruction with an osteoarticular allograft after intra-articular resection of the proximal aspect of the humerus.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Aug;81(8):1138-46. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199908000-00009. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999. PMID: 10466646
-
Malawer type I/V proximal humerus reconstruction after tumor resection: a systematic review.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Sep;33(9):2096-2108. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.015. Epub 2024 Apr 19. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024. PMID: 38642876
-
Use of Vascularized Fibular Epiphyseal Transfer with Massive Bone Allograft for Proximal Humeral Reconstruction in Children with Bone Sarcoma.Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7834-7841. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10032-y. Epub 2021 May 11. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33974195 Review.
Cited by
-
Megaprosthesis Versus Allograft Prosthesis Composite for the Management of Massive Skeletal Defects: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021 Jun;14(3):255-270. doi: 10.1007/s12178-021-09707-6. Epub 2021 Apr 17. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021. PMID: 33864628 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Modular tumor prostheses of the humerus].Orthopade. 2010 Oct;39(10):968-79. doi: 10.1007/s00132-009-1564-x. Orthopade. 2010. PMID: 20862578 German.
-
Megaprosthesis versus Allograft Prosthesis Composite for massive skeletal defects.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):63-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 25. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018. PMID: 29628687 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Proximal humerus allograft prosthetic composites: technique, outcomes, and pearls and pitfalls.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015 Dec;8(4):324-33. doi: 10.1007/s12178-015-9306-7. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015. PMID: 26420311 Free PMC article.
-
Complications and Survivorship of Distal Humeral Allograft Reconstruction After Tumor Resection: Literature Review and Case Series.J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 Feb 11;5(2):e20.00256-8. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00256. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021. PMID: 33591127 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical