Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1990 Nov;81(11):1081-4.
doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02515.x.

Production of both 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in liver DNA and gamma-glutamyltransferase-positive hepatocellular lesions in rats given a choline-deficient, L-amino acid-defined diet

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Production of both 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in liver DNA and gamma-glutamyltransferase-positive hepatocellular lesions in rats given a choline-deficient, L-amino acid-defined diet

D Nakae et al. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1990 Nov.

Abstract

The comparative carcinogenic activities of a choline-deficient, L-amino acid-defined diet (CDAADD) and a purified choline-deficient diet (CDD) for rat liver were studied in terms of both 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine induction, a marker of DNA damage induced by oxidative stress, and development of gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT)-positive putative preneoplastic lesions, including foci and hyperplastic nodules. Twelve weeks after the beginning of treatment, DNA damage could be detected in the liver DNA of rats receiving either CDAADD or CDD, the degree being significantly greater in the former case. Similarly, while GGT-positive liver lesions were induced by both CDAADD and CDD, the numbers were higher and the areas of lesions were larger in rats receiving CDAADD than in those given CDD. Histologically, hyperplastic nodules were induced in the livers of animals administered CDAADD whereas only foci were seen in the CDD case. The results thus indicate that oxidative stress might be directly involved in rat liver carcinogenesis by CDD and, to a greater degree, with CDAADD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. ) Mikol , Y. B. , Hoover , K. , Creasis , D. and Poirier , L. A.Hepatocarcinogenesis in rats fed methyl‐deficient, amino acid defined diets . Carcinogenesis , 4 , 1619 – 1629 ( 1983. ). - PubMed
    1. ) Ghoshal , A. K. and Farber , E.The induction of liver cancer by dietary deficiency of choline and methionine without added carcinogens . Carcinogenesis , 5 , 1367 – 1370 ( 1984. ). - PubMed
    1. ) Yokoyama , S. , Sells , S. A. , Reddy , T. V. and Lombardi , B.Hepatocarcinogenesis and promoting action of a choline‐devoid diet in the rat . Cancer Res. , 45 , 2834 – 2842 ( 1985. ). - PubMed
    1. ) Abanobi , S. E. , Lombardi , B. and Shinozuka , H.Stimulation of DNA synthesis and cell proliferation in the liver of rats fed a choline‐devoid diet and their suppression by phenobarbital . Cancer Res. , 42 , 412 – 415 ( 1982. ). - PubMed
    1. ) Giambarresi , L. I. , Katyal , S. L. and Lombardi , B.Promotion of liver carcinogenesis in the rat by a choline‐devoid diet: role of liver cell necrosis and regeneration . Br. J. Cancer , 46 , 825 – 829 ( 1982. ). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources