Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 Nov-Dec;5(6):470-3.
doi: 10.1007/BF02600871.

Impact of echocardiography on the management of patients with mitral valve prolapse

Affiliations

Impact of echocardiography on the management of patients with mitral valve prolapse

K E Olive et al. J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether echocardiography affects the decisions to use beta blockers or to recommend bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis in patients suspected of having mitral valve prolapse (MVP).

Design: Retrospective review of echocardiograms and clinical records.

Setting: Military tertiary care hospital.

Patients: 127 patients with clinically suspected MVP (105) or incidentally discovered MVP (22).

Main results: Beta blockers were used more often in patients with suspected MVP and positive echocardiograms (45%) than in patients with normal echocardiograms (13%, p less than 0.001). Bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis was recommended more often in patients with suspected MVP and positive echocardiograms (65%) than in patients with normal echocardiograms (11%, p less than 0.001). Presence or absence of a murmur did not influence the decision to recommend bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis. Patients in whom MVP was incidentally discovered were unlikely to receive either beta blockers or the recommendation for bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis.

Conclusions: The results of echocardiography affect the decisions to use beta blockers or to recommend bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis in patients with suspected MVP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Circulation. 1976 Mar;53(3):464-73 - PubMed
    1. Am Heart J. 1987 May;113(5):1324-32 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 1987 Jul;25(7):652-7 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 1981 Mar;19(3):310-5 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1989 Dec 15;262(23):3308-12 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources