Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation
- PMID: 19801058
- PMCID: PMC3008558
- DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.005
Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation
Abstract
Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Reisman DS, Boyd L, Jacobson Kimberley T, Schindler-Ivens SM, Hornby TG, Ross SA, Scheets PL. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation.
Objective: To investigate how much movement practice occurred during stroke rehabilitation, and what factors might influence doses of practice provided.
Design: Observational survey of stroke therapy sessions.
Setting: Seven inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation sites.
Participants: We observed a convenience sample of 312 physical and occupational therapy sessions for people with stroke.
Interventions: Not applicable.
Main outcome measures: We recorded numbers of repetitions in specific movement categories and data on potential modifying factors (patient age, side affected, time since stroke, FIM item scores, years of therapist experience). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize amounts of practice. Correlation and regression analyses were used to determine whether potential factors were related to the amount of practice in the 2 important categories of upper extremity functional movements and gait steps.
Results: Practice of task-specific, functional upper extremity movements occurred in 51% of the sessions that addressed upper limb rehabilitation, and the average number of repetitions/session was 32 (95% confidence interval [CI]=20-44). Practice of gait occurred in 84% of sessions that addressed lower limb rehabilitation and the average number of gait steps/session was 357 (95% CI=296-418). None of the potential factors listed accounted for significant variance in the amount of practice in either of these 2 categories.
Conclusions: The amount of practice provided during poststroke rehabilitation is small compared with animal models. It is possible that current doses of task-specific practice during rehabilitation are not adequate to drive the neural reorganization needed to promote function poststroke optimally.
Comment in
-
Physical activity following stroke.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Apr;91(4):665-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.12.007. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010. PMID: 20382307 No abstract available.
References
-
- Kleim JA, Barbay S, Nudo RJ. Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:3321–3325. - PubMed
-
- Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791–1794. - PubMed
-
- Fine MS, Thoroughman KA. Motor adaptation to single force pulses: Sensitive to direction but insensitive to within-movement pulse placement and magnitude. J Neurophysiol. 2006;96:710–720. - PubMed
-
- Boyd L, Winstein C. Explicit information interferes with implicit motor learning of both continuous and discrete movement tasks after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006;30:46–57. discussion 58–49. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
