Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct;17(5):337-44.
doi: 10.1037/a0017260.

Rapid cognitive screening of patients with substance use disorders

Affiliations

Rapid cognitive screening of patients with substance use disorders

Marc L Copersino et al. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

To date, there has not been a time-efficient and resource-conscious way to identify cognitive impairment in patients with substance use disorders (SUDs). In this study, we assessed the validity, accuracy, and clinical utility of a brief (10-min) screening instrument, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), in identifying cognitive impairment among patients with SUDs. The Neuropsychological Assessment Battery-Screening Module, a 45-min battery with known sensitivity to the mild to moderate deficits observed in patients with SUDs, was used as the reference criterion for determining agreement, rates of correct and incorrect decision classifications, and criterion-related validity for the MoCA. Classification accuracy of the MoCA, based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, was strong, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.86, 95% confidence interval [0.75, 0.97]. The MoCA also showed acceptable sensitivity (83.3%) and specificity (72.9%) for the identification of cognitive impairment. Using a cutoff of 25 on the MoCA, the overall agreement was 75.0%; chance-corrected agreement (kappa) was 41.9%. These findings indicate that the MoCA provides a time-efficient and resource-conscious way to identify patients with SUDs and neuropsychological impairment, thus addressing a critical need in the addiction treatment research community.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sensitivity and specificity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in classifying 60 patients as cognitively impaired versus unimpaired. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.86, standard error = 0.06, asymptotic normal 95% confidence interval [0.75, 0.97].

References

    1. Aharonovich E, Hasin DS, Brooks AC, Liu X, Bisaga A, Nunes EV. Cognitive deficits predict low treatment retention in cocaine dependent patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2006;81(3):313–322. - PubMed
    1. Aharonovich E, Nunes E, Hasin D. Cognitive impairment, retention and abstinence among cocaine abusers in cognitive-behavioral treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2003;71(2):207–211. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates ME, Convit A. Neuropsychology and neuroimaging of alcohol and illicit drug abuse. In: Calev A, editor. The Assessment of Neuropsychological Functions in Psychiatric Disorders. American Psychiatric Publishing; Washington, DC: 1999. pp. 373–445.
    1. Bates ME, Pawlak AP, Tonigan JS, Buckman JF. Cognitive impairment influences drinking outcome by altering therapeutic mechanisms of change. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2006;20(3):241–253. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berry J, van Gorp WG, Herzberg DS, Hinkin C, Boone K, Steinman L, et al. Neuropsychological deficits in abstinent cocaine abusers: preliminary findings after two weeks of abstinence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1993;32(3):231–237. - PubMed

Publication types