Racial differences in predictors of intensive end-of-life care in patients with advanced cancer
- PMID: 19805675
- PMCID: PMC2792953
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4733
Racial differences in predictors of intensive end-of-life care in patients with advanced cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Black patients are more likely than white patients to receive life-prolonging care near death. This study examined predictors of intensive end-of-life (EOL) care for black and white advanced cancer patients.
Patients and methods: Three hundred two self-reported black (n = 68) and white (n = 234) patients with stage IV cancer and caregivers participated in a US multisite, prospective, interview-based cohort study from September 2002 to August 2008. Participants were observed until death, a median of 116 days from baseline. Patient-reported baseline predictors included EOL care preference, physician trust, EOL discussion, completion of a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order, and religious coping. Caregiver postmortem interviews provided information regarding EOL care received. Intensive EOL care was defined as resuscitation and/or ventilation followed by death in an intensive care unit.
Results: Although black patients were three times more likely than white patients to receive intensive EOL care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.04, P = .037), white patients with a preference for this care were approximately three times more likely to receive it (aOR = 13.20, P = .008) than black patients with the same preference (aOR = 4.46, P = .058). White patients who reported an EOL discussion or DNR order did not receive intensive EOL care; similar reports were not protective for black patients (aOR = 0.53, P = .460; and aOR = 0.65, P = .618, respectively).
Conclusion: White patients with advanced cancer are more likely than black patients with advanced cancer to receive the EOL care they initially prefer. EOL discussions and DNR orders are not associated with care for black patients, highlighting a need to improve communication between black patients and their clinicians.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Comment in
-
What's race got to do with it?J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 20;27(33):5496-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2206. Epub 2009 Oct 5. J Clin Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19805664 No abstract available.
References
-
- Weitzen S, Teno J, Fennell M, et al. Factors associated with site of death: A national study of where people die. Med Care. 2003;41:323–335. - PubMed
-
- Pritchard R, Fisher E, Teno J, et al. Influence of patient preferences and local health system characteristics on the place of death: SUPPORT Investigators Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Risks and Outcomes of Treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:1242–1250. - PubMed
-
- Phipps EJ, True G, Murray GF. Community perspectives on advance care planning: Report from the Community Ethics Program. J Cult Divers. 2003;10:118–123. - PubMed
-
- Bayer W, Mallinger JB, Krishnan A, et al. Attitudes toward life-sustaining interventions among ambulatory black and white patients. Ethn Dis. 2006;16:914–919. - PubMed
-
- Winter L, Parker B. Current health and preferences for life-prolonging treatments: An application of prospect theory to end-of-life decision making. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:1695–1707. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
