Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct 5;4(10):e7340.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007340.

Costs and effects of abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of controlled trials

Claudia B M Bijen  1 , Karin M Vermeulen, Marian J E Mourits, Geertruida H de Bock
Affiliations

Costs and effects of abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of controlled trials

Claudia B M Bijen et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: Comparative evaluation of costs and effects of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and abdominal hysterectomy (AH).

Data sources: Controlled trials from Cochrane Central register of controlled trials, Medline, Embase and prospective trial registers.

Selection of studies: Twelve (randomized) controlled studies including the search terms costs, laparoscopy, laparotomy and hysterectomy were identified.

Methods: The type of cost analysis, perspective of cost analyses and separate cost components were assessed. The direct and indirect costs were extracted from the original studies. For the cost estimation, hospital stay and procedure costs were selected as most important cost drivers. As main outcome the major complication rate was taken.

Findings: Analysis was performed on 2226 patients, of which 1013 (45.5%) in the LH group and 1213 (54.5%) in the AH group. Five studies scored > or =10 points (out of 19) for methodological quality. The reported total direct costs in the LH group ($63,997) were 6.1% higher than the AH group ($60,114). The reported total indirect costs of the LH group ($1,609) were half of the total indirect in the AH group ($3,139). The estimated mean major complication rate in the LH group (14.3%) was lower than in the AH group (15.9%). The estimated total costs in the LH group were $3,884 versus $3,312 in the AH group. The incremental costs for reducing one patient with major complication(s) in the LH group compared to the AH group was $35,750.

Conclusions: The shorter hospital stay in the LH group compensates for the increased procedure costs, with less morbidity. LH points in the direction of cost effectiveness, however further research is warranted with a broader costs perspective including long term effects as societal benefit, quality of life and survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of included studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Incremental costs and effects for patients with major complications (A) and all complications (B) per 100 patients ▪  =  RCT □  =  CCT.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Manolitsas TP, McCartney AJ. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy in the management of endometrial carcinoma. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9:54–62. - PubMed
    1. Obermair A, Manolitsas TP, Leung Y, Hammond IG, McCartney AJ. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15:319–324. - PubMed
    1. Gemignani ML, Curtin JP, Zelmanovich J, Patel DA, Venkatraman E, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes and hospital charges. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;73:5–11. - PubMed
    1. Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Buttarelli M, Tateo S, Balestreri D, et al. Incisional hernia in gynecologic oncology patients: a 10-year study. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:696–700. - PubMed
    1. Semm K. [Endoscopic methods in gastroenterology and gynecology. Completion of diagnostic pelviscopy by endoscopic abdominal surgery]. Fortschr Med. 1984;102:534–537. - PubMed

Publication types