Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;20(1):69-80.
doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9204-1.

Understanding decisions about work after spinal cord injury

Affiliations

Understanding decisions about work after spinal cord injury

Joanna K Fadyl et al. J Occup Rehabil. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Research has consistently shown that many people with spinal cord injury (SCI) do not return to work (RTW), despite evidence that being employed is associated with better quality of life, participation and physical and psychological well-being. While some factors associated with RTW outcome have been identified, very little is known about what influences people's own decisions about their employment following SCI. This qualitative study sought to identify factors that influenced decisions about whether and when to RTW for people with SCI.

Methods: Participants were recruited through rehabilitation and support services in Aotearoa/New Zealand, and sampling sought to capture variation in the population, particularly with regard to pre-injury occupation, physical impairment, age, ethnicity and education. In-depth interviews were conducted which were audio-taped and transcribed. Interviews were analysed using rigorous methods drawn from grounded theory.

Results: Thirteen participants took part in the research. Findings identified four main themes that synthesised experiences about what influenced decisions about employment after SCI: (1) ability to work (given work demands and current resources); (2) presence of responsibilities or pressures that compete with work; (3) access to a suitable job; and (4) whether work was of enough benefit to the individual to be worth pursuing.

Conclusions: Findings illustrate the complexity of decisions about working after SCI, and provide a framework that health and vocational professionals may find useful to inform discussions with their clients. Findings also provide a basis for further research into interventions to support people to make informed decisions about employment after SCI.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Mar;81(3):359-63 - PubMed
    1. Spinal Cord. 2007 Feb;45(2):124-39 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2007 Jan;16(1):17-25 - PubMed
    1. Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Dec 30;29(24):1858-69 - PubMed
    1. Brain Inj. 2006 Mar;20(3):227-36 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources