Meta-analysis of rare and adverse event data
- PMID: 19807443
- DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2.4.367
Meta-analysis of rare and adverse event data
Abstract
Potentially beneficial drugs may have side effects. Such adverse events may be serious but rare, making their effect difficult to quantify, or even their identification problematic within randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis provides a means of combining such outcome data across a series of studies and provides a more powerful analysis than is possible from a single study. However, meta-analysis of adverse event data presents some unique methodological challenges. Procedural issues pertaining to study selection and the inclusion of both randomized and observational data are discussed. The statistical problem of combining rare outcomes is also considered at length. Model choice, continuity corrections, exact statistics, Bayesian methods and sensitivity analysis are all covered. The application of results from adverse event meta-analyses to clinical and economic decision models is also considered. A number of examples are presented to illustrate the key points.
Similar articles
-
[Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].Epidemiol Prev. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2 Suppl):1-71. Epidemiol Prev. 2001. PMID: 11515188 Italian.
-
What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.Stat Med. 2004 May 15;23(9):1351-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.1761. Stat Med. 2004. PMID: 15116347
-
Meta-analysis of rare events: an update and sensitivity analysis of cardiovascular events in randomized trials of rosiglitazone.Clin Trials. 2008;5(2):116-20. doi: 10.1177/1740774508090212. Clin Trials. 2008. PMID: 18375649
-
Meta-analyses of safety data: a comparison of exact versus asymptotic methods.Stat Methods Med Res. 2009 Aug;18(4):421-32. doi: 10.1177/0962280208092559. Epub 2008 Jun 18. Stat Methods Med Res. 2009. PMID: 18562399
-
Challenges in meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials for rare harmful cardiovascular events: the case of rosiglitazone.Am Heart J. 2008 Jul;156(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 May 5. Am Heart J. 2008. PMID: 18585493 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing the quality of meta-analyses in systematic reviews in pharmaceutical research in Iran by 2016: A systematic review.Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Apr 6;34:30. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.30. eCollection 2020. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020. PMID: 32617269 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evidence Synthesis in Harm Assessment of Medicines Using the Example of Rosiglitazone and Myocardial Infarction.Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Feb 22;4:228. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00228. eCollection 2017. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018. PMID: 29520360 Free PMC article.
-
Checking whether there is an increased risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and other cancers with specific modern immunosuppression regimens in renal transplantation: protocol for a network meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 22;3:16. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-16. Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24559430 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Safety of Pharmacologic Treatments for Persistent Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.PLoS One. 2016 May 17;11(5):e0153380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153380. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27187783 Free PMC article.
-
Reporting Quality of Oral TCM Systematic Reviews Based on the PRISMA Harms Checklist from 2013 to 2020.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2023 Jan 24;2023:4612036. doi: 10.1155/2023/4612036. eCollection 2023. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2023. PMID: 36733845 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources