Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 May;42(4):317-21.
doi: 10.1080/08916930902832124.

Apoptotic and necrotic cells as sentinels of local tissue stress and inflammation: response pathways initiated in nearby viable cells

Affiliations
Review

Apoptotic and necrotic cells as sentinels of local tissue stress and inflammation: response pathways initiated in nearby viable cells

Vimal A Patel et al. Autoimmunity. 2009 May.

Abstract

Virtually all cells in the body have the capacity to recognize and respond to dead cells. Viable cells discriminate apo from nec targets via distinct cell surface receptors. Engagement of these receptors induces "recognition-dependent" signaling events in viable responding cells that differ for apo vs. nec targets. Although "engulfment-dependent" signaling events also contribute to the response by viable cells, these events do not differ for apo vs. nec targets. While many signaling events are conserved across diverse cell lineages, other signaling events, especially those involving Akt, demonstrate lineage-specific variation. Whereas apo targets activate Akt in MPhi, they inhibit Akt in kidney epithelial cells. Differences in the responses to dead targets by viable migratory cells, such as MPhi, and viable fixed cells, such as kidney epithelial cells, permit cell-specific adaptations to local environmental change or stress. We propose that dead cells (apo and nec) act as sentinels to alert nearby viable cells to local environmental change or stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dead cells act as sentinels of local environmental change. (A) As depicted, the nature of the response of nearby viable cells to dead target cells is determined by three dichotomies: (1) the form of target cell death (apo vs. nec); (2) the dependence of viable cell signals on receptor-mediated recognition vs. engulfment of the dead targets; and (3) the nature of the responding cell (migratory vs. fixed). (B) The responses of MΦ, a migratory cell, are contrasted with those of fixed and organ-specific kidney epithelial cells.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Savill J, Dransfield I, Gregory C, Haslett C. A blast from the past: Clearance of apo cells regulates immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:965–975. - PubMed
    1. Fadok VA, Bratton DL, Konowal A, Freed PW, Westcott JY, Henson PM. Macrophages that have ingested apo cells in vitro inhibit proinflammatory cytokine production through autocrine/paracrine mechanisms involving TGF-β, PGE2, and PAF. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:890–898. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Voll RE, Herrmann M, Roth EA, Stach C, Kalden JR, Girkontaite I. Immunosuppressive effects of apo cells. Nature. 1997;390:350–351. - PubMed
    1. Cocco RE, Ucker DS. Distinct modes of macrophage recognition for apo and nec cells are not specified exclusively by phosphatidylserine exposure. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12:919–930. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cvetanovic M, Ucker DS. Innate immune discrimination of apo cells: Repression of pro-inflammatory macrophage transcription is coupled directly to specific recognition. J Immunol. 2004;172:880–889. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources