Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec;90(6):1457-65.
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28141. Epub 2009 Oct 7.

Estimates of body composition with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in adults

Affiliations
Free article

Estimates of body composition with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in adults

Chaoyang Li et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the distributions of percentage body fat (PBF), total body fat (TBF), and fat-free mass (FFM) in the adult population in the United States.

Objectives: We sought to estimate the means and percentile cutoffs of PBF, TBF, and FFM and to assess the differences by sex, age, race-ethnicity, and body mass index in US adults.

Design: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which were collected during the 6-y period from 1999 to 2004 and comprise a large nationally representative sample of the US population, were analyzed (n = 6559 men and 6507 nonpregnant women). TBF and FFM were measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. PBF was calculated as TBF divided by total mass multiplied by 100.

Results: There were large differences between men and women in unadjusted mean PBF (28.1% compared with 40.0%, P < 0.001), TBF (25.4 compared with 30.8 kg, P < 0.001), and FFM (62.3 compared with 44.0 kg, P < 0.001); the sex differences persisted across all body mass index categories after adjustment for age and race-ethnicity (all P < 0.001). The common percentile cutoffs of PBF, TBF, and FFM were estimated by sex, race-ethnicity, and age groups. Equations for the estimation of PBF (R(2) = 0.85), TBF (R(2) = 0.94), and FFM (R(2) = 0.94) according to demographic characteristics and simple anthropometric measures were generated.

Conclusion: The estimates of means and percentile cutoffs for PBF, TBF, and FFM, on the basis of NHANES 1999-2004 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data, provide a reference in the US adult population.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources