Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct 8:9:44.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-44.

Information management to enable personalized medicine: stakeholder roles in building clinical decision support

Affiliations

Information management to enable personalized medicine: stakeholder roles in building clinical decision support

Gregory J Downing et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Background: Advances in technology and the scientific understanding of disease processes are presenting new opportunities to improve health through individualized approaches to patient management referred to as personalized medicine. Future health care strategies that deploy genomic technologies and molecular therapies will bring opportunities to prevent, predict, and pre-empt disease processes but will be dependent on knowledge management capabilities for health care providers that are not currently available. A key cornerstone to the potential application of this knowledge will be effective use of electronic health records. In particular, appropriate clinical use of genomic test results and molecularly-targeted therapies present important challenges in patient management that can be effectively addressed using electronic clinical decision support technologies.

Discussion: Approaches to shaping future health information needs for personalized medicine were undertaken by a work group of the American Health Information Community. A needs assessment for clinical decision support in electronic health record systems to support personalized medical practices was conducted to guide health future development activities. Further, a suggested action plan was developed for government, researchers and research institutions, developers of electronic information tools (including clinical guidelines, and quality measures), and standards development organizations to meet the needs for personalized approaches to medical practice. In this article, we focus these activities on stakeholder organizations as an operational framework to help identify and coordinate needs and opportunities for clinical decision support tools to enable personalized medicine.

Summary: This perspective addresses conceptual approaches that can be undertaken to develop and apply clinical decision support in electronic health record systems to achieve personalized medical care. In addition, to represent meaningful benefits to personalized decision-making, a comparison of current and future applications of clinical decision support to enable individualized medical treatment plans is presented. If clinical decision support tools are to impact outcomes in a clear and positive manner, their development and deployment must therefore consider the needs of the providers, including specific practice needs, information workflow, and practice environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The role of CDS tools and electronic and personal health records in the development of clinical practice guidelines and quality measures. (Solid lines indicate currently available information flow patterns, dotted line represents potential pathways for future data flow).

References

    1. Willard HW. In: Genomic and Personalized Medicine. Willard HW, Ginsburg GS, editor. Vol. 1. London: Academic Press; 2009. Organization, variation and expression of the human genome as a foundation of genomic and personalized medicine; pp. 4–21.
    1. Glaser J, Henley DE, Downing G, Brinner KM. Advancing Personalized Health Care through Health Information Technologyw: An Update from the American Health Information Community's Personalized Health Care Workgroup. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:391–396. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2718. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manolio TA, Brooks LD, Collins FS. A HapMap harvest of insights into the genetics of common disease. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:1590–1605. doi: 10.1172/JCI34772. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenes RA. In: Clinical Decision Support: the Road Ahead. Greenes RA, editor. Amsterdam, Elsevier; 2007. A brief history of clinical decision support: technical, social, cultural, economic, and governmental perspectives; pp. 31–91.
    1. Osheroff J, Teich J, Middleton B, Steen E, Wright A, Detmer D. A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:141–145. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2334. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources