Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct;18(10):2579-99.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0135.

Association of area socioeconomic status and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review

Sandi L Pruitt  1 , Matthew J Shim, Patricia Dolan Mullen, Sally W Vernon, Benjamin C Amick 3rd
Affiliations

Association of area socioeconomic status and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review

Sandi L Pruitt et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Although numerous studies have examined the association of area socioeconomic status (SES) and cancer screening after controlling for individual SES, findings have been inconsistent. A systematic review of existing studies is timely to identify conceptual and methodologic limitations and to provide a basis for future research directions and policy.

Objective: The objectives were to (a) describe the study designs, constructs, methods, and measures; (b) describe the independent association of area SES and cancer screening; and (c) identify neglected areas of research.

Methods: We searched six electronic databases and manually searched cited and citing articles. Eligible studies were published before 2008 in peer-reviewed journals in English, represented primary data on individuals ages > or = 18 years from developed countries, and measured the association of area and individual SES with breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer screening.

Results: Of 19 eligible studies, most measured breast cancer screening. Studies varied widely in research design, definitions, and measures of SES, cancer screening behaviors, and covariates. Eight employed multilevel logistic regression, whereas the remainder analyzed data with standard single-level logistic regression. The majority measured one or two indicators of area and individual SES; common indicators at both levels were poverty, income, and education. There was no consistent pattern in the association between area SES and cancer screening.

Discussion: The gaps and conceptual and methodologic heterogeneity in the literature to date limit definitive conclusions about an underlying association between area SES and cancer screening. We identify five areas of research deserving greater attention in the literature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search results and application of eligibility criteria
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures. 2009. [Accessed on 5–6–2009]; Available from: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/STT/STT_0.asp.
    1. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:11–25. - PubMed
    1. U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services, 2007: Recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2007; 20080311. Report No.: AHRQ Publication No. 07–05100.
    1. Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:389–94. - PubMed

Publication types