ISPOR Health Policy Council proposed Good Research Practices for comparative effectiveness research: benefit or harm?
- PMID: 19818061
- PMCID: PMC4036452
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00653.x
ISPOR Health Policy Council proposed Good Research Practices for comparative effectiveness research: benefit or harm?
Comment on
-
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part I.Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1044-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00600.x. Epub 2009 Sep 29. Value Health. 2009. PMID: 19793072
References
-
- Eden J, et al., editors. Knowing What Works in Health Care: A Roadmap for the Nation. National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2008.
-
- Institute of Medicine. Monograph on Comparative Effectiveness Research. 2009. in press.
-
- Tunis S. Comparative Effectiveness: Basic Terms and Concepts. Center for Medical Technology Policy; San Francisco, CA: 2007. http://www.allhealth.org/briefingmaterials/Tunis4-27-07-699.pdf.
-
- Kolata Gina. NY Times. Nov 25, 2008. New arena for testing of drugs: real world.
-
- Miettinen OS. The need for randomization in the study of intended effects. Stat Med. 1983;2:267–271. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources