ISPOR Health Policy Council proposed Good Research Practices for comparative effectiveness research: benefit or harm?
- PMID: 19818061
- PMCID: PMC4036452
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00653.x
ISPOR Health Policy Council proposed Good Research Practices for comparative effectiveness research: benefit or harm?
Comment on
-
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part I.Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1044-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00600.x. Epub 2009 Sep 29. Value Health. 2009. PMID: 19793072
Similar articles
-
The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1086-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00605.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10. Value Health. 2009. PMID: 19744291
-
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: analytic methods to improve causal inference from nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part III.Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1062-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00602.x. Epub 2009 Sep 29. Value Health. 2009. PMID: 19793071
-
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part II.Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1053-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00601.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10. Value Health. 2009. PMID: 19744292
-
Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research: Part I. Basic considerations.Pain Physician. 2010 Jan-Feb;13(1):E23-54. Pain Physician. 2010. PMID: 20119474 Review.
-
A review of covariate selection for non-experimental comparative effectiveness research.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Nov;22(11):1139-45. doi: 10.1002/pds.3506. Epub 2013 Sep 5. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013. PMID: 24006330 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Eden J, et al., editors. Knowing What Works in Health Care: A Roadmap for the Nation. National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2008.
-
- Institute of Medicine. Monograph on Comparative Effectiveness Research. 2009. in press.
-
- Tunis S. Comparative Effectiveness: Basic Terms and Concepts. Center for Medical Technology Policy; San Francisco, CA: 2007. http://www.allhealth.org/briefingmaterials/Tunis4-27-07-699.pdf.
-
- Kolata Gina. NY Times. Nov 25, 2008. New arena for testing of drugs: real world.
-
- Miettinen OS. The need for randomization in the study of intended effects. Stat Med. 1983;2:267–271. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources