Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Nov;9(6):443-50.
doi: 10.1007/s11910-009-0066-x.

Biological approaches to aphasia treatment

Affiliations
Review

Biological approaches to aphasia treatment

Steven L Small et al. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

In this review, we discuss the basic mechanisms of neural regeneration and repair and attempt to correlate findings from animal models of stroke recovery with clinical trials for aphasia. Several randomized controlled clinical trials involving manipulation of different neurotransmitter systems, including noradrenergic, dopaminergic, cholinergic, and glutamatergic systems, have shown signals of efficacy. Biological approaches such as anti-Nogo and cell replacement therapy have shown efficacy in preclinical models but have yet to reach proof of concept in the clinic. Finally, noninvasive cortical stimulation techniques have been used in a few small trials and have shown promising results. It appears that the efficacy of all these platforms can be potentiated through coupling with concomitant behavioral intervention. Given this array of potential mechanisms that exist to augment and/or stimulate neural reorganization after stroke, we are optimistic that approaches to aphasia therapy will transition from compensatory models to models in which brain reorganization is the goal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Small SL. Biological Approaches to the Treatment of Aphasia. In: Hillis A, editor. Handbook on Adult Language Disorders: Integrating Cognitive Neuropsychology, Neurology, and Rehabilitation. Psychology Press; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: 2001. pp. 397–411.
    1. Horng S, Sur M. Visual activity and cortical rewiring: activity-dependent plasticity of cortical networks. Progress in Brain Research. 2006;157:3–11. - PubMed
    1. McCloskey M, Cohen NJ. Catastrophic Interference in Connectionist Networks: The Sequential Learning Problem. In: Bower G, editor. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Academic Press; New York: 1989. pp. 109–165.
    1. Gernsbacher MA, St John MF. Learning and losing syntax: Practice makes perfect and frequency builds fortitude. In: Healy AF, Bourne JLE, editors. Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic experiments on training and retention. Laurence Erlbaum Associates; Mawah, NJ: 1998. pp. 231–255.
    1. Cohen HP, Woltz AG, Jacobson RL. Catecholamine Content of Cerebral Tissue after Occlusion or Manipulation of Middle Cerebral Artery in Cats. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1975;43:32–36. - PubMed

Publication types