Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Nov;9(6):451-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11910-009-0067-9.

Research with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of aphasia

Affiliations
Review

Research with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of aphasia

Paula I Martin et al. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been used to improve language behavior, including naming, in stroke patients with chronic, nonfluent aphasia. Part 1 of this article reviews functional imaging studies related to language recovery in aphasia. Part 2 reviews the rationale for using rTMS to treat nonfluent aphasia (based on functional imaging) and presents our current rTMS protocol. We present language results from our rTMS studies as well as imaging results from overt naming functional MRI scans obtained before and after a series of rTMS treatments. Part 3 presents results from a pilot study in which rTMS treatments were followed immediately by constraint-induced language therapy. Part 4 reviews our diffusion tensor imaging study examining the possible connectivity of the arcuate fasciculus to different parts of Broca's area (pars triangularis, pars opercularis) and to the ventral premotor cortex. The potential role of mirror neurons in the right pars opercularis and ventral premotor cortex in aphasia recovery is discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
RH cortical ROIs examined during Phase 1 rTMS treatment protocol including M1, mouth (orbicularis oris, verified with motor evoked potential), superior temporal gyrus (STG) and subregions within Broca’s area: PTr posterior, and POp. Phase 1 establishes the location of the Best RH Cortical ROI to Suppress during Phase 2, treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overt naming fMRI results for ROI analysis pre- and post-Phase 2 rTMS for P1, good responder. Results shown for scans pre-TMS, 3 mo. post-TMS, 16 mo. post-TMS, and 46 mo. post-TMS. Bar graph displays the mean effect size for the L and R SMA activation. There was a significant shift to greater L SMA activation at 16 mo. post-TMS compared to pre-TMS and to 3 mo. post-TMS. Greater L SMA activation still remained at 46 mo. post-TMS.

References

    1. Crosson B, McGregor K, Gopinath KS, Conway TW, Benjamin M, Chang YL, Moore AB, Raymer AM, Briggs RW, Sherod MG, et al. Functional MRI of language in aphasia: a review of the literature and the methodological challenges. Neuropsychol Rev. 2007;17(2):157–177. This article reviews fMRI studies with aphasia patients and examines the question of the role of each hemisphere in language recovery. It also examines various methodological challenges in aphasia. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gold BT, Buckner RL. Common prefrontal regions coactivate with dissociable posterior regions during controlled semantic and phonological tasks. Neuron. 2002;35(4):803–812. - PubMed
    1. Price CJ, Crinion J. The latest on functional imaging studies of aphasic stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. 2005;18(4):429–434. - PubMed
    1. Thiel A, Habedank B, Herholz K, Kessler J, Winhuisen L, Haupt WF, Heiss WD. From the left to the right: How the brain compensates progressive loss of language function. Brain Lang. 2006;98(1):57–65. - PubMed
    1. Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS. Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17 (1):35–43. - PubMed

Publication types