Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Feb;20(1):19-25.
doi: 10.1016/j.ghir.2009.09.005. Epub 2009 Oct 8.

Measurement of human growth hormone by immunoassays: current status, unsolved problems and clinical consequences

Affiliations
Review

Measurement of human growth hormone by immunoassays: current status, unsolved problems and clinical consequences

Martin Bidlingmaier et al. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Measuring the concentration of growth hormone (GH) in blood samples taken during dynamic tests represents the basis for diagnosis of growth hormone related disorders, namely growth hormone deficiency and growth hormone excess. Today, a wide spectrum of immunoassays are in use, enabling rapid and sensitive determination of growth hormone concentrations in routine diagnostics. From a clinical point of view several difficulties exist with the use and interpretation of GH assay results in the assessment of GH related disorders: Many physiological factors such as fat mass, age and gender influence the outcome of dynamic tests, overall leading to significant inter-individual differences in GH responses. However, in addition to the physiological variability, considerable variability exists in GH assay results obtained by different immunoassays. Unfortunately, all the new technical advances in the field of GH measurement techniques have not reduced this methodological variability. To a large extent, the actual values reported for the GH concentration in a sample depend on the method used by the respective laboratory. Obviously, such discrepancies limit the applicability of consensus guidelines on diagnosis and treatment in clinical practice. This review summarizes current practices for GH measurement with respect to the methods used, their limitations and the clinical consequences of the existing heterogeneity in GH immunoassay results.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gemzell CA, Heijkenskjold F, Strom L. A method for demonstrating growth hormone activity in human plasma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1955;15:537–546. - PubMed
    1. Segaloff A, Komrad EL, Flores A, Segaloff A, Hardesty M. The growth hormone content of human plasma. Endocrinology. 1955;57:527–530. - PubMed
    1. Dattani MT, Hindmarsh PC, Brook CG, Robinson IC, Weir T, Marshall NJ. Enhancement of growth hormone bioactivity by zinc in the eluted stain assay system. Endocrinology. 1993;133:2803–2808. - PubMed
    1. Lesniak MA, Gorden P, Roth J, Gavin JR., 3rd Binding of 125I-human growth hormone to specific receptors in human cultured lymphocytes. Characterization of the interaction and a sensitive radioreceptor assay. J Biol Chem. 1974;249:1661–1667. - PubMed
    1. Yalow RS, Berson SA. Assay of plasma insulin in human subjects by immunological methods. Nature. 1959;184(Suppl 21):1648–1649. - PubMed

MeSH terms