Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Oct;22(4):634-50.
doi: 10.1128/CMR.00017-09.

Clinical significance of enteric protozoa in the immunosuppressed human population

Affiliations
Review

Clinical significance of enteric protozoa in the immunosuppressed human population

D Stark et al. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Globally, the number of immunosuppressed people increases each year, with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pandemic continuing to spread unabated in many parts of the world. Immunosuppression may also occur in malnourished persons, patients undergoing chemotherapy for malignancy, and those receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Components of the immune system can be functionally or genetically abnormal as a result of acquired (e.g., caused by HIV infection, lymphoma, or high-dose steroids or other immunosuppressive medications) or congenital illnesses, with more than 120 congenital immunodeficiencies described to date that either affect humoral immunity or compromise T-cell function. All individuals affected by immunosuppression are at risk of infection by opportunistic parasites (such as the microsporidia) as well as those more commonly associated with gastrointestinal disease (such as Giardia). The outcome of infection by enteric protozoan parasites is dependent on absolute CD4(+) cell counts, with lower counts being associated with more severe disease, more atypical disease, and a greater risk of disseminated disease. This review summarizes our current state of knowledge on the significance of enteric parasitic protozoa as a cause of disease in immunosuppressed persons and also provides guidance on recent advances in diagnosis and therapy for the control of these important parasites.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Photomicrographs of enteric protozoa stained with a modified iron-hematoxylin stain (incorporating a carbol fuschin staining step). (A) Cyclospora oocysts; (B) Cryptosporidium oocysts; (C) Dientamoeba fragilis binucleated trophozoite; (D) Dientamoeba fragilis uninucleated trophozoite; (E) Entamoeba histolytica cysts; (F) Entamoeba histolytica trophozoite; (G) Giardia cysts; (H) Giardia trophozoites. Bars represent 10 μm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdo, A., J. Klassen, S. Urbanski, E. Raber, and M. G. Swain. 2003. Reversible sclerosing cholangitis secondary to cryptosporidiosis in a renal transplant patient. J. Hepatol. 38:688-691. - PubMed
    1. Abubakar, I., S. H. Aliyu, C. Arumugam, P. R. Hunter, and N. K. Usman. 2008. Prevention and treatment of cryptosporidiosis in immunocompromised patients. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004932.pub2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ackers, J. P., and D. Mirelman. 2006. Progress in research on Entamoeba histolytica pathogenesis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 9:367-373. - PubMed
    1. Ahmad, N., M. Khan, M. I. Hoque, R. Haque, and D. Mondol. 2007. Detection of Entamoeba histolytica DNA from liver abscess aspirate using polymerase chain reaction (PCR): a diagnostic tool for amoebic liver abscess. Bangladesh Med. Res. Counc. Bull. 33:13-20. - PubMed
    1. Aldras, A. M., J. M. Orenstein, D. P. Kotler, J. A. Shadduck, and E. S. Didier. 1994. Detection of microsporidia by indirect immunofluorescence antibody test using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:608-612. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances