Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial
- PMID: 19826022
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1426
Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial
Abstract
Context: Limited data are available to assess whether endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) improves short-term outcomes compared with traditional open repair.
Objective: To compare postoperative outcomes up to 2 years after endovascular or open repair of AAA in a planned interim report of a 9-year trial.
Design, setting, and patients: A randomized, multicenter clinical trial of 881 veterans (aged > or = 49 years) from 42 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers with eligible AAA who were candidates for both elective endovascular repair and open repair of AAA. The trial is ongoing and this report describes the period between October 15, 2002, and October 15, 2008.
Intervention: Elective endovascular (n = 444) or open (n = 437) repair of AAA.
Main outcome measures: Procedure failure, secondary therapeutic procedures, length of stay, quality of life, erectile dysfunction, major morbidity, and mortality.
Results: Mean follow-up was 1.8 years. Perioperative mortality (30 days or inpatient) was lower for endovascular repair (0.5% vs 3.0%; P = .004), but there was no significant difference in mortality at 2 years (7.0% vs 9.8%, P = .13). Patients in the endovascular repair group had reduced median procedure time (2.9 vs 3.7 hours), blood loss (200 vs 1000 mL), transfusion requirement (0 vs 1.0 units), duration of mechanical ventilation (3.6 vs 5.0 hours), hospital stay (3 vs 7 days), and intensive care unit stay (1 vs 4 days), but required substantial exposure to fluoroscopy and contrast. There were no differences between the 2 groups in major morbidity, procedure failure, secondary therapeutic procedures, aneurysm-related hospitalizations, health-related quality of life, or erectile function.
Conclusions: In this report of short-term outcomes after elective AAA repair, perioperative mortality was low for both procedures and lower for endovascular than open repair. The early advantage of endovascular repair was not offset by increased morbidity or mortality in the first 2 years after repair. Longer-term outcome data are needed to fully assess the relative merits of the 2 procedures.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00094575.
Comment in
-
Comparing endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.JAMA. 2010 Feb 10;303(6):513-4; author reply 514. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.87. JAMA. 2010. PMID: 20145221 No abstract available.
-
Comparing endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.JAMA. 2010 Feb 10;303(6):513; author reply 514. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.86. JAMA. 2010. PMID: 20145222 No abstract available.
-
Comparing endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.JAMA. 2010 Feb 10;303(6):514; author reply 514. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.88. JAMA. 2010. PMID: 20145223 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Long-term Cost-effectiveness in the Veterans Affairs Open vs Endovascular Repair Study of Aortic Abdominal Aneurysm: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Surg. 2016 Dec 1;151(12):1139-1144. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2783. JAMA Surg. 2016. PMID: 27627802 Clinical Trial.
-
Women derive less benefit from elective endovascular aneurysm repair than men.J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):906-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.047. Epub 2012 Feb 8. J Vasc Surg. 2012. PMID: 22322123
-
Identifying patients with AAA with the highest risk following endovascular repair.Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2012 Aug;46(6):455-9. doi: 10.1177/1538574412450752. Epub 2012 Jun 18. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2012. PMID: 22717782
-
Comparison of endovascular and open surgical repairs for abdominal aortic aneurysm.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006 Aug;(144):1-113. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006. PMID: 17764213 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Surgery insight: advances in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007 Apr;4(4):206-13. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0849. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007. PMID: 17380166 Review.
Cited by
-
Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Overview of Current Guidance, Strategies, and New Technologies, Perspectives from the United Kingdom.J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 15;11(18):5415. doi: 10.3390/jcm11185415. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36143063 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical outcome of early relaparotomy after elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015 Mar;88(3):160-5. doi: 10.4174/astr.2015.88.3.160. Epub 2015 Feb 27. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015. PMID: 25741496 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture and short-term mortality, 1995-2008: a retrospective observational study.Ann Surg. 2012 Oct;256(4):651-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826b4f91. Ann Surg. 2012. PMID: 22964737 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of a population-based AAA screening program for men over 65 years old in Iran.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 May 13;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00283-7. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021. PMID: 33985531 Free PMC article.
-
Current treatment strategies for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 May;401(3):289-98. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1405-4. Epub 2016 Apr 7. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016. PMID: 27055854 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical