Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr;42(2):178-81.
doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.40254.

Primary and revision lumbar discectomy: a three-year review from one center

K N Acharya  1 , T S Senthil Nathan, J Renjit Kumar, K Venugopal Menon
Affiliations

Primary and revision lumbar discectomy: a three-year review from one center

K N Acharya et al. Indian J Orthop. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Despite variations in technique, the results of primary and revision lumbar discectomy have been good. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review cases of primary and revision lumbar discectomy performed in our institute over a three-year period.

Materials and methods: The case records of 273 patients who underwent lumbar discectomy between January 2001-2004 and fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria were reviewed. Of these, 259 were primary discectomies and 14 were revision surgeries. Recurrence was defined as ipsilateral disc herniation at the previously operated level. Demographic parameters, magnetic resonance imaging of the disc, patient satisfaction and rate of recurrence were analyzed.

Results: The primary surgery group had 52 (20.08%) contained and 207 (79.92%) extruded or sequestered discs, while the numbers in the revision group were three (21.43%) and 11 (78.57%) respectively. "Satisfactory" outcome was noted in 96.5% of the primary surgeries, with a recurrence rate of 3.5%. In the revision group 78.6% had "satisfactory" outcome. In 9.4% of the primary group we encountered complications, while it was 21.43% in the revision group.

Conclusions: Lumbar discectomy is a safe, simple and effective procedure with satisfactory outcome in 96.5% of primary disc surgery and 78.6% of revision disc surgery.

Keywords: Lumbar discectomy; herniated disc; revision discectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Axial MR image of a patient in the primary discectomy category - MRI showing extruded disc (arrow)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Axial MR image of a patient in the revision category - MRI showing track of previous procedure (arrow) and sequestered fragment in canal (arrow head)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mathews HH, Long BH. Minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of intervertebral disk herniation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10:80–5. - PubMed
    1. Morgan-Hough CV, Jones PW, Eisenstein SM. Primary and revision lumbar discectomy: A 16-year review from one centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:871–4. - PubMed
    1. Gibson JNA, Waddell G. Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse: Updated cochrane review. Spine. 2007;32:1735–47. - PubMed
    1. Hardy RW., Jr . Lumbar discectomy: Surgical tactics and management of complications. Chapter 90. In: Frymoyer JW, editor. The adult spine Principles and practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott - Raven Publishers; 1997. pp. 1947–59.
    1. Cinotti G, Roysam GS, Eisenstein SM, Postacchini F. Ipsilateral recurrent lumbar disc herniation. A prospective, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:825–32. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources