Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct 14;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S15.
doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-9-S1-S15.

System-level determinants of immunization coverage disparities among health districts in Burkina Faso: a multiple case study

Affiliations

System-level determinants of immunization coverage disparities among health districts in Burkina Faso: a multiple case study

Slim Haddad et al. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. .

Abstract

Background: Despite rapid and tangible progress in vaccine coverage and in premature mortality rates registered in sub-Saharan Africa, inequities to access remain firmly entrenched, large pockets of low vaccination coverage persist, and coverage often varies considerably across regions, districts, and health facilities' areas of responsibility. This paper focuses on system-related factors that can explain disparities in immunization coverage among districts in Burkina Faso.

Methods: A multiple-case study was conducted of six districts representative of different immunization trends and overall performance. A participative process that involved local experts and key actors led to a focus on key factors that could possibly determine the efficiency and efficacy of district vaccination services: occurrence of disease outbreaks and immunization days, overall district management performance, resources available for vaccination services, and institutional elements. The methodology, geared toward reconstructing the evolution of vaccine services performance from 2000 to 2006, is based on data from documents and from individual and group interviews in each of the six health districts. The process of interpreting results brought together the field personnel and the research team.

Results: The districts that perform best are those that assemble a set of favourable conditions. However, the leadership of the district medical officer (DMO) appears to be the main conduit and the rallying point for these conditions. Typically, strong leadership that is recognized by the field teams ensures smooth operation of the vaccination services, promotes the emergence of new initiatives and offers some protection against risks related to outbreaks of epidemics or supplementary activities that can hinder routine functioning. The same is true for the ability of nurse managers and their teams to cope with new situations (epidemics, shortages of certain stocks).

Conclusion: The discourse on factors that determine the performance or breakdown of local health care systems in lower and middle income countries remains largely concentrated on technocratic and financial considerations, targeting institutional reforms, availability of resources, or accessibility of health services. The leadership role of those responsible for the district, and more broadly, of those we label "the human factor", in the performance of local health care systems is mentioned only marginally. This study shows that strong and committed leadership promotes an effective mobilization of teams and creates the conditions for good performance in districts, even when they have only limited access to supports provided by external partners. ABSTRACT IN FRENCH: See the full article online for a translation of this abstract in French.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Health district of Koya.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Health district of Bougou.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Health district of Mandé.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Health district of Dara.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Health district of Dié.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Health district of Boka.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. GAVI. Gavi Alliance Performance Global Results. http://www.gavialliance.org/performance/global_results/index.php (accessed July 24, 2008).
    1. Lu C, Michaud CM, Gakidou E, Khan K, Murray CJL. Effect of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation on diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine coverage: an independent assessment. Lancet. 2006;368:1088–1095. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69337-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arevshatian L, Clements CJ, Lwanga SK, Misore AO, Ndumbe P, Seward JF, Taylor P. An evaluation of infant immunization in Africa: is a transformation in progress? Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:449–457. doi: 10.2471/BLT.06.031526. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jamil K, Bhuiya A, Streatfield K, Chakrabarty N. The immunization programme in Bangladesh: impressive gains in coverage, but gaps remain. Health Policy Plan. 1999;14:49–58. doi: 10.1093/heapol/14.1.49. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balraj V, Mukundan S, Samuel R, John TJ. Factors affecting immunization coverage levels in a district of India. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22:1146–1153. doi: 10.1093/ije/22.6.1146. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources