Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct 14;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S7.
doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-9-S1-S7.

Equity and vaccine uptake: a cross-sectional study of measles vaccination in Lasbela District, Pakistan

Affiliations

Equity and vaccine uptake: a cross-sectional study of measles vaccination in Lasbela District, Pakistan

Steven Mitchell et al. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. .

Abstract

Background: Achieving equity means increased uptake of health services for those who need it most. But the poorest families continue to have the poorest service. In Pakistan, large numbers of children do not access vaccination against measles despite the national government's effort to achieve universal coverage.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of a random sample of 23 rural and 9 urban communities in the Lasbela district of south Pakistan, explored knowledge, attitudes and discussion around measles vaccination. Several socioeconomic variables allowed examination of the role of inequities in vaccination uptake; 2479 mothers provided information about 4007 children aged 10 to 59 months. A Mantel-Haenszel stratification analysis, with and without adjustment for clustering, clarified determinants of measles vaccination in urban and rural areas.

Results: A high proportion of mothers had appropriate knowledge of and positive attitudes to vaccination; many discussed vaccination, but only one half of children aged 10-59 months accessed vaccination. In urban areas, having an educated mother, discussing vaccinations, having correct knowledge about vaccinations, living in a community with a government vaccination facility within 5 km, and living in houses with better roofs were associated with vaccination uptake after adjusting for the effect of each of these variables and for clustering; maternal education was an equity factor even among those with good access. In rural areas, the combination of roof quality and access (vaccination post within 5 km) along with discussion about vaccines and knowledge about vaccines had an effect on uptake.

Conclusion: Stagnating rates of vaccination coverage may be related to increasing inequities. A hopeful finding is that discussion about vaccines and knowledge about vaccines had a positive effect that was independent of the negative effect of inequity - in both urban and rural areas. At least as a short term strategy, there seems to be reason to expect an intervention increasing knowledge and discussion about vaccination in this district might increase uptake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of children aged 10-59 months vaccinated among equity sub-groups in urban areas.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of children aged 10-59 months vaccinated among equity sub-groups in rural areas.

References

    1. Heggenhougen HK. The epidemiology of inequity: Will research make a difference? Norsk Epidemiologi. 2005;15:127–132.
    1. Marmot M. Achieving health equity: from root causes to fair outcomes. Lancet. 2007;370:1153–1163. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61385-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The World Bank. World Development Report 2004. Making Services Work for Poor People. Washington. 2003.
    1. Whitehead M, Dahlgren G, Evans T. Equity and health sector reforms: can low-income countries escape the medical poverty trap? Lancet. 2001;358:833–836. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05975-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The World Bank. World Development Report 2006. Equity and Development, Washington. 2005.

LinkOut - more resources