Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct 13:4:65.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-65.

Barriers and supports to implementation of MDI/spacer use in nine Canadian pediatric emergency departments: a qualitative study

Shannon D Scott  1 , Martin H Osmond, Kathy A O'Leary, Ian D Graham, Jeremy Grimshaw, Terry Klassen; Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) MDI/spacer Study Group
Collaborators, Affiliations

Barriers and supports to implementation of MDI/spacer use in nine Canadian pediatric emergency departments: a qualitative study

Shannon D Scott et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Despite recent research supporting the use of metered dose inhalers with spacer devices (MDI/spacers) in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) for acute exacerbations of asthma, uptake of this practice has been slow. The objectives of this study were to determine the barriers and supports to implementing MDI/spacer research and to identify factors associated with early and late adoption of MDI/spacers in Canadian PEDs.

Methods: Using a comparative case study design, we classified nine tertiary care pediatric hospital PEDs based on their stage of implementation. Data were collected using focus group interviews with physicians, registered nurses (RNs), and respiratory therapists (RTs), and individual interviews with both patient care and medical directors at each site. Initial coding was based on the Ottawa Model of Research Use (OMRU) categories of elements known to influence the uptake of innovations.

Results: One hundred and fifty healthcare professionals from nine different healthcare institutions participated in this study. Lack of leadership in the form of a research champion, a lack of consensus about the benefits of MDI/spacers among staff, perceived resistance from patients/parents, and perceived increased cost and workload associated with MDI/spacer use were the most prevalent barriers to the adoption of the MDI/spacer. Common strategies used by early-adopting sites included the active participation of all professional groups in the adoption process in addition to a well-planned and executed educational component for staff, patients, and families. Early adopter sites were also more likely to have the MDI/spacer included in a clinical protocol/pathway.

Conclusion: Potential barriers and supports to implementation have been identified that will help EDs adopt MDI/spacer use. Future interventions intended to increase MDI/spacer use in PEDs will need to be sensitive to the barriers identified in this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cates CJ, Crilly JA, Rowe BH. Holding chambers versus nebulisers for beta-agonist treatment of acute asthma (Cochrane Review) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;1:CD000052. - PubMed
    1. Tien I, Dorfman D, Kastner B, Bauchner H. Metered-dose inhaler: The emergency department orphan. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:1335–1339. - PubMed
    1. Gazarian M, Henry RL, Wales SR. Evaluating the effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for the use of spacer devices in children with acute asthma. MJA. 2001;174:394–397. - PubMed
    1. Powell CVE, Maskell GR, Marks MK, South M, Robertson CF. Successful implementation of spacer treatment guideline for acute asthma. Arch Dis Child. 2001;84:142–146. doi: 10.1136/adc.84.2.142. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cotterell EM, Gazarian M, Henry RL, O'Meara MW, Wales SR. Child and patient satisfaction with the use of spacer devices in acute asthma. J Paediatr Child Health. 2002;38:604–607. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2002.00063.x. - DOI - PubMed