Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov;47(11):1181-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11517-009-0539-8. Epub 2009 Oct 15.

Control of triceps surae stimulation based on shank orientation using a uniaxial gyroscope during gait

Affiliations

Control of triceps surae stimulation based on shank orientation using a uniaxial gyroscope during gait

C C Monaghan et al. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

This article presents a stimulation control method using a uniaxial gyroscope measuring angular velocity of the shank in the sagittal plane, to control functional electrical stimulation of the triceps surae to improve push-off of stroke subjects during gait. The algorithm is triggered during each swing phase of gait when the angular velocity of the shank is relatively high. Subsequently, the start of the stance phase is detected by a change of sign of the gyroscope signal at approximately the same time as heel strike. Stimulation is triggered when the shank angle reaches a preset value since the beginning of stance. The change of angle is determined by integrating angular velocity from the moment of change of sign. The results show that the real-time reliability of stimulation control was at least 95% for four of the five stroke subjects tested, two of which were 100% reliable. For the remaining subject, the reliability was increased from 50% found during the experiment, to 99% during offline processing. Our conclusion is that a uniaxial gyroscope on the shank is a simple, more reliable alternative to the heel switch for the purpose of restoring push-off of stroke subjects during gait.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Healthy subject data. a Shank angular velocity. b Integrated angular velocity (shank angle)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow chart depicting the main steps involved in the stimulation control algorithm
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Subject donned with equipment for FES experiments
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patient Data. a Angular velocity [deg/s] of stroke subject number 5 during gait. Uppermost, horizontal dashed line is T sw, parallel to this, along zero is the zero line. The vertical lines indicate zero crossing. b Integrated angular velocity (change in angle in [deg] vs. time [s]) since negative crossing through zero

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burridge JH, Taylor PN, Hagan SA, Wood DE, Swain ID. The effects of common peroneal stimulation on the effort and speed of walking: a randomized controlled trial with chronic hemiplegic patients. Clin Rehabil. 1997;11(3):201–210. doi: 10.1177/026921559701100303. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kottink AIR, Oostendorp LJM, Buurke JH, Nene AV, Hermens HJ, IJzerman MJ (2004) The orthotic effect of functional electrical stimulation on the improvement of walking in stroke patients with a dropped foot: a systematic review. Artif Organs 28(6):577–586 - PubMed
    1. Knutsson E. Muscle activation patterns of gait in spastic hemiparesis, paraparesis and cerebral palsy. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1980;7(Suppl):47–52. - PubMed
    1. Knutsson E. Gait control in hemiparesis. Scand J Rehab Med. 1981;13:101–108. - PubMed
    1. Knutsson E, Richards C. Different types of disturbed motor control in hemiparetic patients. Brain. 1979;102:405–430. doi: 10.1093/brain/102.2.405. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types