Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2009 Oct;36(5 Suppl):161S-6S; discussion 167S-71S.
doi: 10.1177/1090198109340512.

Behavioral theory in the context of applied cancer screening research

Affiliations
Comment

Behavioral theory in the context of applied cancer screening research

Jane Zapka et al. Health Educ Behav. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

The U.S. health care system is indeed challenged to provide effective, equitable, and efficient care for its citizens (Aday, Begley, Lairson, & Balkrishnan, 2004). The past decades have witnessed profound concern about the quality of care Americans receive, the equality of care across racial ethnic communities, and the escalating costs of private and public coverage. These concerns apply to the cancer care continuum, including screening. This commentary reflects on the methods, findings, and implications of the articles from the Behavioral Constructs and Culture in Cancer Screening (3Cs) in this Health Education & Behavior supplement. This commentary considers several important themes for consideration in applied screening research, including the (a) focus on population diversity in a cultural context, (b) domains of social context and their importance, and (c) contributions of an interdisciplinary team and mixed methods to research productivity. Although the articles focus on breast cancer screening, the methods, observations, and recommendations are relevant to other screening tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Comment on

References

    1. Aday LA, Begley CE, Lairson DA, Balkrishnan R. Evaluating the healthcare system: Effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. 3. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 2004.
    1. Anderson LM, Scrimshaw SC, Fullilove MT, Fielding JE. The community guide’s model for linking the social environment to health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003;24(Suppl. 3):12–20. - PubMed
    1. Bailey TM, Delva J, Gretebeck K, Siefert K, Ismail A. A systematic review of mammography educational interventions for low-income women. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2005;20(2):96–107. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baron RC, Rimer BK, Breslow RA, Coates RJ, Kerner J, Melillo S, et al. Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008;35(Suppl. 1):S34–S55. - PubMed
    1. Burke NJ, Bird JA, Clark MA, Rakowski W, Guerra C, Barker JC, et al. Social and cultural meanings of self-efficacy. Health Education & Behavior. 2009;36(Suppl. 1):111S–128S. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types