Research integrity in China: problems and prospects
- PMID: 19832885
- PMCID: PMC2891906
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00263.x
Research integrity in China: problems and prospects
Abstract
In little more than 30 years, China has recovered from the intellectual stagnation brought about by the Cultural Revolution to become a global leader in science and technology. Like other leading countries in science and technology, China has encountered some ethical problems related to the conduct of research. China's leaders have taken some steps to respond to these problems, such as developing ethics policies and establishing oversight committees. To keep moving forward, China needs to continue to take effective action to promote research integrity. Some of the challenges China faces include additional policy development, promoting education in responsible conduct of research, protecting whistle-blowers, and cultivating an ethical research environment.
Published 2009.
Similar articles
-
The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science.J Higher Educ. 1994 May-Jun;65(3):261-85. J Higher Educ. 1994. PMID: 11653364 No abstract available.
-
Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.Account Res. 1999;7(1):85-100. doi: 10.1080/08989629908573943. Account Res. 1999. PMID: 11657564 No abstract available.
-
Guidelines for training in the ethical conduct of scientific research.Sci Eng Ethics. 1995 Jan;1(1):59-70. doi: 10.1007/BF02628698. Sci Eng Ethics. 1995. PMID: 11657881 No abstract available.
-
Keeping a clean research environment: Addressing research misconduct and improving scientific integrity in China.Cancer Lett. 2019 Nov 1;464:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Aug 17. Cancer Lett. 2019. PMID: 31430529 Review. No abstract available.
-
Canadian policy on reporting breaches of research integrity: When should Research Ethics Boards be informed?Account Res. 2019 Oct;26(7):460-471. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1661243. Epub 2019 Aug 30. Account Res. 2019. PMID: 31462108 Review.
Cited by
-
The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.Curr Sociol. 2017 Oct;65(6):814-845. doi: 10.1177/0011392116663807. Epub 2016 Oct 13. Curr Sociol. 2017. PMID: 28943647 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A comprehensive review of Hep-2 cell line in translational research for laryngeal cancer.Am J Cancer Res. 2019 Apr 1;9(4):644-649. eCollection 2019. Am J Cancer Res. 2019. PMID: 31105993 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Plagiarism as Reported by Participants Completing the AuthorAID MOOC on Research Writing.Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Apr;26(2):1067-1088. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00198-1. Epub 2020 Feb 17. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020. PMID: 32067186
-
A Comparison of the Effects of Ethics Training on International and US Students.Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Aug;22(4):1217-1244. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9678-5. Epub 2015 Jul 9. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016. PMID: 26156891
-
Ethical Perspectives of Chinese and United States Physicians at Initiation of a Research Collaborative.Account Res. 2022 Jul;29(5):294-308. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1920014. Epub 2021 May 4. Account Res. 2022. PMID: 33877028 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Steneck N. Confronting Misconduct in Science in the 1980s and 1990s: What Has and Has Not been Accomplished. Sci Eng Ethics. 1999;5:161–176. - PubMed
-
-
Aschwanden, op. cit. note 1.
-
-
-
Ibid; Cho M, McGee G, Magnus D. Research Conduct: Lessons of the Stem Cell Scandal. Science. 2006;311:614–615.Saunders R, Savulescu J. Research Ethics and Lessons from Hwanggate: What Can We Learn from the Korean Cloning Fraud? J Med Ethics. 2008;34:214–221.
-
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources