The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli
- PMID: 19833112
- DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.007
The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli
Abstract
The neural processing fate of target and nontarget singleton stimuli was investigated in a series of visual search tasks. The first experiment showed that the ERPs elicited by nontargets defined in the same feature dimension as targets were identical to those of targets until a relatively late divergence in the P3 time range. The second experiment showed that increased stimulus duration allowed slightly faster attentional selection: The ERPs of targets and nontargets now diverged earlier at the N2pc component, although nontargets still elicited a reliable N2pc, which was indicative of the processing of features of these stimuli. It furthermore seemed that task difficulty did not modulate the observed differences between target and nontarget processing. The third experiment investigated the impact of stimulus-response mapping as well as target probability. The former did not modulate the observed differences, and while the latter modulated absolute ERP amplitude, it again did not change the overall pattern of results. No evidence was found in these experiments for differential processing of targets and nontargets defined in the same feature dimension in the time range of the P2 component or before. In a final experiment, targets were compared with nontargets defined in the same or another feature dimension, and for the latter nontargets a clearly much earlier locus of divergent processing was observed, starting at the P2. The N2pc to these nontargets was also strongly suppressed. The relatively late locus of attentional selection between targets and nontargets defined in the same feature dimension suggested that early attentional processes cannot yet fully distinguish between specific within-dimension features.
Similar articles
-
Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.Brain Res. 2009 Aug 4;1283:84-101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.077. Epub 2009 Jun 6. Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19501066
-
Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Apr;21(4):760-75. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21039. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 18564048
-
The allocation of attention in displays with simultaneously presented singletons.Biol Psychol. 2011 May;87(2):218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.022. Epub 2011 Mar 21. Biol Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21406208
-
Selective attention modulates extrastriate visual regions in humans during visual feature discrimination and recognition.Ciba Found Symp. 1991;163:165-75; discussion 175-80. doi: 10.1002/9780470514184.ch10. Ciba Found Symp. 1991. PMID: 1815890 Review.
-
Neuromodulation of decision and response selection.Neural Netw. 2002 Jun-Jul;15(4-6):635-45. doi: 10.1016/s0893-6080(02)00054-0. Neural Netw. 2002. PMID: 12371517 Review.
Cited by
-
Controlling Unpleasant Thoughts: Adjustments of Cognitive Control Based on Previous-Trial Load in a Working Memory Task.Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jan 24;13:469. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00469. eCollection 2019. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32038201 Free PMC article.
-
Neural correlates of changes in a visual search task due to cognitive training in seniors.Neural Plast. 2012;2012:529057. doi: 10.1155/2012/529057. Epub 2012 Sep 17. Neural Plast. 2012. PMID: 23029625 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Brain activity underlying visual search in depth when viewing volumetric multiplanar images.Sci Rep. 2023 May 11;13(1):7672. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34758-9. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37169911 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources