Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research
- PMID: 19833552
- PMCID: PMC3260536
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016
Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research
Abstract
This article is based on a consensus conference, which took place in Certosa di Pontignano, Siena (Italy) on March 7-9, 2008, intended to update the previous safety guidelines for the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in research and clinical settings. Over the past decade the scientific and medical community has had the opportunity to evaluate the safety record of research studies and clinical applications of TMS and repetitive TMS (rTMS). In these years the number of applications of conventional TMS has grown impressively, new paradigms of stimulation have been developed (e.g., patterned repetitive TMS) and technical advances have led to new device designs and to the real-time integration of TMS with electroencephalography (EEG), positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Thousands of healthy subjects and patients with various neurological and psychiatric diseases have undergone TMS allowing a better assessment of relative risks. The occurrence of seizures (i.e., the most serious TMS-related acute adverse effect) has been extremely rare, with most of the few new cases receiving rTMS exceeding previous guidelines, often in patients under treatment with drugs which potentially lower the seizure threshold. The present updated guidelines review issues of risk and safety of conventional TMS protocols, address the undesired effects and risks of emerging TMS interventions, the applications of TMS in patients with implanted electrodes in the central nervous system, and safety aspects of TMS in neuroimaging environments. We cover recommended limits of stimulation parameters and other important precautions, monitoring of subjects, expertise of the rTMS team, and ethical issues. While all the recommendations here are expert based, they utilize published data to the extent possible.
Figures


Comment in
-
Comment on: Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research, by Rossi et al. (2009).Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Jun;121(6):980. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 Apr 20. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010. PMID: 20409750 No abstract available.
-
Seizure produced by 20 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation during isometric muscle contraction in a healthy subject.Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Nov;122(11):2326-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 May 7. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011. PMID: 21550843 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Abraham WC, Bear MF. Metaplasticity: the plasticity of synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:126–30. - PubMed
-
- Adams RD, Victor M. Principles of Neurology. 2nd ed. McGraw Hill; New York: 1977. Faintness and Syncope. pp. 248–57. [Chapter 17]
-
- Ajmone-Marsan C. Focal electrical stimulation. In: Purpura DP, Penry JK, Tower DB, Woodbury DM, Walter RD, editors. Experimental Models of Epilepsy. Raven Press; New York: 1972. pp. 147–72.
-
- Alagona G, Coco M, Rapisarda G, Costanzo E, Maci T, Restivo D, et al. Changes of blood lactate levels after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurosci Lett. 2009;450:111–3. - PubMed
-
- Aleman A, Sommer IE, Kahn RS. Efficacy of slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of resistant auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiat. 2007;68:416–21. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous