Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec 11;284(50):34839-48.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.035683. Epub 2009 Oct 15.

Leukocyte Ig-like receptor B4 (LILRB4) is a potent inhibitor of FcgammaRI-mediated monocyte activation via dephosphorylation of multiple kinases

Affiliations

Leukocyte Ig-like receptor B4 (LILRB4) is a potent inhibitor of FcgammaRI-mediated monocyte activation via dephosphorylation of multiple kinases

Hao Kim Lu et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

The leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor (LILR) B4 belongs to a family of cell surface receptors that possesses cytoplasmic immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs). LILRB4 is believed to down-regulate activation signals mediated by non-receptor tyrosine kinase cascades through the recruitment of SHP-1. However, the exact mechanisms of LILRB4-mediated inhibition are not fully elucidated. In this study, we demonstrate high level surface expression of LILRB4 on THP-1 cells and primary peripheral blood monocytes, which profoundly inhibited production of a key pro-inflammatory cytokine (TNFalpha) induced by FcgammaRI (CD64). We also report that LILRB4 aggregated to sites of activation upon co-ligation with CD64 and that this may enhance its inhibitory effects. Cross-linking of CD64 on THP-1 cells markedly increased phosphorylation of multiple proteins including tyrosine kinases and signaling molecules (Lck, Syk, LAT, and Erk), an adaptor protein that targets protein-tyrosine kinases for degradation (c-Cbl) and a protein involved in the formation of actin cytoskeletal rearrangement (alpha-actinin-4). Co-ligation of LILRB4 considerably reduced CD64-mediated phosphorylation of Lck, Syk, LAT, Erk, and c-Cbl but not alpha-actinin-4, suggesting selective inhibition of signaling molecules. Treatment of cells with a broad-spectrum phosphatase inhibitor, sodium pervanadate (SP), significantly reversed LILRB4-mediated inhibition of TNFalpha production and protein tyrosine phosphorylation. In comparison, treatment with an SHP-1 specific inhibitor, sodium stibogluconate (SS) has no effects indicating involvement of phosphatase(s) other than SHP-1 in LILRB4 signaling. Collectively, our data show LILRB4 is a potent inhibitor of monocytes activation. This may provide a new potential therapeutic strategy for inflammatory conditions characterized by excessive TNFalpha production.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Co-ligation of LILRB4 reduced CD64-mediated TNFα production and protein-tyrosine phosphorylation on THP-1 cells. A, representative data showing comparable surface expression of LILRB4 and CD64, as determined by flow cytometry and confirmed by immunoprecipitation. B, TNFα ELISA on culture supernatants from THP-1 cells cross-linked with anti-CD64 monoclonal antibody for 24 h (n = 4); *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 as compared with IgG1 control. C, TNFα ELISA on culture supernatants from THP-1 cells co-ligated with saturation amounts of anti-CD64 and anti-LILRB4 monoclonal antibodies (10 μg/ml each) at various time points. D, shows a summary of four independent TNFα ELISA experiments at the 24-h time point; **, p < 0.01 compared with cells treated with anti-CD64 alone. E, representative anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-pTyr) Western blot of THP-1 cell lysates after a 2 min cross-linking with control IgG1 (lane 1), anti-LILRB4 (lane 2), anti-CD64 (lane 3), or a combination of anti-CD64 and anti-LILRB4 (lane 4) monoclonal antibodies (10 μg/ml each). The lower panel shows the same membrane blotted for β-actin. F, densitometry of three independent anti-pTyr Western blots; #, p < 0.05 compared with IgG1 control; *, p < 0.05 anti-CD64 versus anti-CD64+anti-LILRB4.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Co-ligation of LILRB4 and CD64 on magnetic bead purified or non-purified peripheral blood monocytes significantly abrogated TNFα production. A, representative data on the expression of CD64 and the inhibitory LILRs B1, B2, B3, and B4 on THP-1 cells and primary monocytes as determined by flow cytometry (n = 5). Both THP-1 cells and primary monocytes expressed comparable levels of CD64. However, unlike primary monocytes that expressed all inhibitory LILRs, THP-1 cells selectively expressed high levels of LILRB4. The dotted histograms on the left are corresponding isotype-matched negative controls. B, TNFα ELISA of culture supernatants from 5 × 104 magnetic beads separated monocytes or corresponding peripheral blood mononuclear cells that contained 5 × 104 monocytes after co-ligation of CD64 and LILRB4 for 24 h. C, TNFα ELISA of culture supernatants from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (5 × 104 monocytes) from four independent donors that were activated after co-ligation of CD64 and LILRB4 for 24 h. Note that there are substantial differences among individuals in the amounts of TNFα produced in response to CD64 cross-linking. *, p < 0.05 as compared with cells treated with anti-CD64 alone.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
CD64-mediated phosphorylation of c-Cbl and multiple protein-tyrosine kinases but not α-actinin-4 is down-regulated by LILRB4. A and B, THP-1 cells (5 × 107) were lysed after 2 min of cross-linking with control IgG1 (lane 2), anti-CD64 (lane 3), or a combination of anti-CD64 and anti-LILRB4 (lane 4) monoclonal antibodies (10 μg/ml), followed by anti-pTyr immunoprecipitation. Immunoprecipitated proteins were Western blotted with anti-c-Cbl (A) or anti- α-actinin-4 (B) specific antibodies. C–F, Lck (C), Syk (D), LAT (E), and Erk (F) phosphotyrosine multiplex assay on THP-1 cell lysates after a 2-min cross-linking with same amounts of control IgG1, anti-LILRB4, anti-CD64 or a combination of anti-CD64 and anti-LILRB4 monoclonal antibodies. Error bars indicate S.E. of three independent experiments; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; #, p < 0.05; ###, p < 0.001.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Phosphorylated proteins are increased at sites of receptor activation; LILRB4 is preferentially aggregated at sites of CD64 and LILRB4 co-ligation and down-regulates tyrosine phosphorylation. A, C, and E, representative immuno-fluorescence staining with anti-pTyr (A), anti-pSyk (C), or anti-LILRB4 (E) antibodies on cells treated with anti-CD64, anti-CD64+anti-LILRB4, anti-LILRB4 or control anti-MHC-class I-coated beads. Arrows indicate bead-receptor contact sites. B, D, and F, integrated density of pTyr (B), pSyk (D), and LILRB4 (E) at bead-receptor contact sites. Each dot represents a contact site on an individual cell, and mean values are indicated by horizontal lines. **, p < 0.01; #, p < 0.05.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
LILRB4 signaling is differentially regulated by SS and SP. A, TNFα ELISA on culture supernatants from THP-1 cells cross-linked for 6 h using control IgG1, anti-CD64+IgG1, or anti-CD64+anti-LILRB4 after pretreatment with or without 11 μm SS for 10 min, 24 h, 48 h, or 72 h (n = 3) (**, p < 0.01). B, a representative anti-pTyr Western blot on cell lysates from THP-1 cells that were pretreated with 11 μm SS for 72 h and cross-linked for 2 min with the indicated antibodies. C, TNFα ELISA on culture supernatants from THP-1 cells cross-linked for 6 h using control IgG1, anti-CD64+IgG1, or anti-CD64+anti-LILRB4 after pretreatment with 100 μm SP for 10 min (n = 4) (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ##, p < 0.01). D, representative anti-pTyr Western blot on cell lysates from THP-1 cells that were pretreated with or without 100 μm of SP for 10 min and cross-linked for 2 min with the indicated antibodies. The bottom panels in C and D show the same membranes blotted for β-actin to ensure equal protein loading.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hamerman J. A., Lanier L. L. (2006) Sci. STKE 320, re1. - PubMed
    1. Cambier J. C. (1995) Immunol. Today 16, 110. - PubMed
    1. Bu J. Y., Shaw A. S., Chan A. C. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 5106–5110 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Billadeau D. D., Leibson P. J. (2002) J. Clin. Invest. 109, 161–168 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chacko G. W., Brandt J. T., Coggeshall K. M., Anderson C. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 10775–10781 - PubMed