Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2009 Oct 15;23(20):2359-65.
doi: 10.1101/gad.1860609.

HARPing on about the DNA damage response during replication

Affiliations
Comment

HARPing on about the DNA damage response during replication

Robert Driscoll et al. Genes Dev. .

Abstract

In this issue of Genes & Development, four papers report that the annealing helicase HepA-related protein (HARP, also known as SMARCAL1 [SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a-like 1]) binds directly to the ssDNA-binding protein Replication protein A (RPA) and is recruited to sites of replicative stress. Knockdown of HARP results in hypersensitivity to multiple DNA-damaging agents and defects in fork stability or restart. These exciting insights reveal a key new player in the S-phase DNA damage response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Potential targets of HARP activity at the replication fork. (A) HARP may act to prevent certain events at a stalled fork, stabilizing this structure. For example, it may limit helicase-mediated DNA unwinding at stalled forks to prevent extensive accumulation of ssDNA that may disrupt a stable fork structure (i). Precocious dissociation of the DNA polymerases at unstable forks could also result in unwinding of the nascent strand on the leading (ii) and lagging (iii) strand, and HARP may suppress the formation of these structures. Such unwinding could lead to flap formation and unwanted fork regression or aberrant homologous recombination. HARP could also prevent bubble formation behind the fork at genomic regions that are not yet packaged into chromatin and are inherently unstable, such as A-T-rich regions (iv). (B) Alternatively, after fork stalling, HARP may promote fork regression (left) or certain fork configurations required for lesion bypass (bottom right), but it could also act during a recombination-mediated fork restart event such as break-induced replication (top right).

Comment on

References

    1. Admire A, Shanks L, Danzl N, Wang M, Weier U, Stevens W, Hunt E, Weinert T. Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast. Genes & Dev. 2006;20:159–173. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atkinson J, McGlynn P. Replication fork reversal and the maintenance of genome stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:3475–3492. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bansbach CE, Bétous R, Lovejoy CA, Glick GG, Cortez D. The annealing helicase SMARCAL1 maintains genome integrity at stalled replication forks. Genes & Dev. 2009 doi: 10.1101/gad.1839909. (this issue). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barbour L, Xiao W. Regulation of alternative replication bypass pathways at stalled replication forks and its effects on genome stability: A yeast model. Mutat Res. 2003;532:137–155. - PubMed
    1. Blastyak A, Pinter L, Unk I, Prakash L, Prakash S, Haracska L. Yeast Rad5 protein required for postreplication repair has a DNA helicase activity specific for replication fork regression. Mol Cell. 2007;28:167–175. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources