Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec;99(12):2160-7.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.161414. Epub 2009 Oct 15.

The polarizing effect of news media messages about the social determinants of health

Affiliations

The polarizing effect of news media messages about the social determinants of health

Sarah E Gollust et al. Am J Public Health. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

Framing health problems in terms of the social determinants of health aims to shift policy attention to nonmedical strategies to improve population health, yet little is known about how the public responds to these messages. We conducted an experiment to test the effect of a news article describing the social determinants of type 2 diabetes on the public's support for diabetes prevention strategies. We found that exposure to the social determinants message led to a divergence between Republicans' and Democrats' opinions, relative to their opinions after viewing an article with no message about the causes of diabetes. These results signify that increasing public awareness of the social determinants of health may not uniformly increase public support for policy action.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Probability of agreeing with the statement that “People with diabetes got their illness because of the social or economic circumstances in which they live,” by causal frame viewed and political party of viewer: United States, 2007. Note. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals around the proportion who agreed with the statement.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Degree of support for public health policies after exposure to a news media article about type 2 diabetes, by causal frame viewed and political party of viewer: United States, 2007. Note. Participant opinion for each public health policy based on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), averaged across 7 policies. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals around the predicted mean support for public health policies (where higher values indicate more support). Difference between Democrats and Republicans in social determinants condition relative to control condition is statistically significant (b of interaction term from ordinary least squares regression = −0.45; P = .005). The ordinary least squares regression model included controls for study participants' age, gender, race (White, Black, other), ideological self-identification (liberal, conservative, middle), income, educational attainment, and diabetes status of self and family or friends.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lantz PM, Lichtenstein RL, Pollack HA. Health policy approaches to population health: the limits of medicalization. Health Aff 2007;26(5):1253–1257 - PubMed
    1. Smedley BD. Expanding the frame of understanding health disparities: from a focus on health systems to social and economic systems. Health Educ Behav 2006;33(4):538–541 - PubMed
    1. Tarlov AR. Public policy frameworks for improving population health. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999;896:281–293 - PubMed
    1. CSDH Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008 - PubMed
    1. Lurie N. What the federal government can do about the nonmedical determinants of health. Health Aff 2002;21(2):94–106 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources