Extended regimens of the vaginal contraceptive ring: cycle control
- PMID: 19835716
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.05.004
Extended regimens of the vaginal contraceptive ring: cycle control
Abstract
Background: Oral contraceptives used for extended periods of time have been extensively studied because of their potential benefits; however, there have been few publications on extended regimen of vaginal rings. The aim of this study was to compare the bleeding patterns of women using extended regimens of the vaginal ring or oral contraceptives.
Study design: Prospective cohort involving 150 women: 75 used vaginal rings that release 120 mcg of etonogestrel and 15 mcg of ethinyl estradiol daily, and 75 took oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol 0.3 mcg and desogestrel 150 mcg. Both groups used their respective contraceptive method over continuous periods of 84 days, followed by a 7-day pause, during 1 year.
Results: The total number of scheduled bleeding and spotting days decreased significantly during the 1-year period of the study for both methods (p=.001), and this decrease was significantly higher for oral contraceptive users. Similarly, during the study period, there was a significant reduction in the total number of unscheduled bleeding and spotting days for both methods (p=.01), but this decrease was significantly higher among vaginal ring users (p=.003).
Conclusion: Vaginal ring used on an extended regimen is a contraceptive method that offers good cycle control.
Similar articles
-
Bleeding patterns of women using extended regimens of the contraceptive vaginal ring.Contraception. 2007 Mar;75(3):204-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.10.009. Epub 2007 Jan 18. Contraception. 2007. PMID: 17303490
-
Extended regimens of the contraceptive vaginal ring versus hormonal oral contraceptives: effects on lipid metabolism.Contraception. 2012 Apr;85(4):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.08.014. Epub 2011 Oct 5. Contraception. 2012. PMID: 22067754
-
Extended regimens of the contraceptive vaginal ring: evaluation of clinical aspects.Contraception. 2010 Mar;81(3):223-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.10.007. Epub 2009 Nov 14. Contraception. 2010. PMID: 20159178
-
Lower hormone dosage with improved cycle control.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2002 Dec;7 Suppl 2:25-30; discussion 37-9. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2002. PMID: 12659399 Review.
-
Clinical review of a monophasic oral contraceptive containing desogestrel and ethinyl estradiol.Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1993;38 Suppl 3:117-21. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1993. PMID: 8260969 Review.
Cited by
-
New and emerging contraceptives: a state-of-the-art review.Int J Womens Health. 2014 Feb 19;6:221-34. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S46811. eCollection 2014. Int J Womens Health. 2014. PMID: 24570597 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vaginal ring acceptability and related preferences among women in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.PLoS One. 2019 Nov 8;14(11):e0224898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224898. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31703094 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources