Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;33(1):101-3.
doi: 10.2337/dc09-1366. Epub 2009 Oct 16.

A1C and diabetes diagnosis: The Rancho Bernardo Study

Affiliations

A1C and diabetes diagnosis: The Rancho Bernardo Study

Caroline K Kramer et al. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the sensitivity and specificity of A1C as a diagnostic test for type 2 diabetes in older adults.

Research design and methods: Cross-sectional study of community-dwelling adults without known diabetes who had an oral glucose tolerance test and A1C measured on the same day.

Results: Mean age of the 2,107 participants was 69.4 +/- 11.1 years; 43% were men. Based on the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria, 198 had previously undiagnosed type 2 diabetes. The sensitivity/specificity of A1C cut point of 6.5% was 44/79%. Results were similar in age- and sex-stratified analyses. Given the A1C cut point of 6.5%, 85% of participants were classified as nondiabetic by ADA criteria.

Conclusions: The limited sensitivity of the A1C test may result in delayed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, while the strict use of ADA criteria may fail to identify a high proportion of individuals with diabetes by A1C > or =6.5% or retinopathy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A1C receiver operating characteristic curve for type 2 diabetes diagnosis: (A) whole cohort; (B) men (—) and women (---); and (C) by quartiles of age: first quartile (—), second quartile (---), third quartile (---), and fourth quartile (----).

References

    1. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus (Position Statement). Diabetes Care 2009; 32( Suppl. 1): S62– S67 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris MI, Klein R, Welborn TA, Knuiman MW: Onset of NIDDM occurs at least 4–7 yr before clinical diagnosis. Diabetes Care 1992; 15: 815– 819 - PubMed
    1. Norris SL, Kansagara D, Bougatsos C, Fu R: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening adults for type 2 diabetes: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 855– 868 - PubMed
    1. Saudek CD, Herman WH, Sacks DB, Bergenstal RM, Edelman D, Davidson MB: A new look at screening and diagnosing diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 2447– 2453 - PubMed
    1. Bennett CM, Guo M, Dharmage SC: HbA(1c) as a screening tool for detection of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabet Med 2007; 24: 333– 343 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances