Trends in the content and use of oral contraceptives in the United States, 1964-88
- PMID: 1983923
- PMCID: PMC1404924
- DOI: 10.2105/ajph.81.1.90
Trends in the content and use of oral contraceptives in the United States, 1964-88
Abstract
Drug marketing and physician survey data were used to examine trends in the use and hormonal content of oral contraceptives in the United States between 1964 and 1988. Retail prescriptions for oral contraceptives peaked at approximately 68 million in 1973 and have remained between 50 million and 60 million since 1981. Despite this relative consistency in the number of prescriptions, physician "mentions" of oral contraceptives have increased by approximately 75 percent. This increase may reflect closer monitoring of women on oral contraceptives. Use of multiphasic formulations has steadily risen, accounting for 37 percent of the oral contraceptive prescriptions in 1988. Mean estrogen and progestin doses in all types of formulations have steadily declined. A change in the type of estrogen and progestin used in preparations has coincided with this decline in dose. The association between age and use of high-dose formulations seen in the past was no longer evident in 1988. The data demonstrate that oral contraceptive formulations in wide use today differ in hormone content from those of the past, when most of the major studies addressing the risks associated with oral contraceptive use were completed. There is therefore a need to determine the risks and long-term effects associated with these newer formulations.
Similar articles
-
Steroidal contraceptive use update, United States, 1989-1994.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1996 May;5(3):141-7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1557(199605)5:3<141::AID-PDS221>3.0.CO;2-8. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1996. PMID: 15073830
-
The effects of different formulations of oral contraceptive agents on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism.N Engl J Med. 1990 Nov 15;323(20):1375-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199011153232003. N Engl J Med. 1990. PMID: 2146499
-
[Hormonal contraception].Rev Med Liege. 1992 May;47(5):221-36. Rev Med Liege. 1992. PMID: 1604074 Review. French.
-
Oral contraception reviewed.IPPF Med Bull. 1979 Jun;13(3):1-2. IPPF Med Bull. 1979. PMID: 12335871
-
The metabolic impact of oral contraceptives.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Oct;167(4 Pt 2):1177-84. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90408-1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992. PMID: 1415443 Review.
Cited by
-
Oral contraception and the risk of thromboembolism: what does it mean to clinicians and their patients?Drug Saf. 2002;25(13):893-902. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200225130-00001. Drug Saf. 2002. PMID: 12381211 Review.
-
A prospective cohort study of oral contraceptive use and ovarian cancer among women in the United States born from 1947 to 1964.Cancer Causes Control. 2017 May;28(5):371-383. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0876-0. Epub 2017 Mar 13. Cancer Causes Control. 2017. PMID: 28290016 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of neural tube defect (NTD)-protective circulating concentrations of folate in women of child-bearing age in the US post-folic acid fortification era.Nutr Res Pract. 2013 Aug;7(4):315-25. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2013.7.4.315. Epub 2013 Aug 7. Nutr Res Pract. 2013. PMID: 23964320 Free PMC article.
-
Types of combined oral contraceptives used by US women.Contraception. 2012 Dec;86(6):659-65. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jul 6. Contraception. 2012. PMID: 22770787 Free PMC article.
-
Polymorphisms in stromal genes and susceptibility to serous epithelial ovarian cancer: a report from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium.PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019642. Epub 2011 May 27. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21637745 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous