Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009;22(2):118-22.

Sealing ability of MTA used as cervical barrier in intracoronal bleaching

Affiliations
  • PMID: 19839488
Comparative Study

Sealing ability of MTA used as cervical barrier in intracoronal bleaching

Manoel Brito-Júnior et al. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2009.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the sealing ability of white mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) with that of other materials used as a cervical barrier during intracoronal bleaching. Thirty eight extracted teeth were endodontically treated and 3 mm of filling was removed to receive the barrier material: G1-Coltosol; G2 - Vidrion R; G3 - White MTA; G4-No barrier (negative control) and G5- Roots totally protected with three layers of cyanoacrylate (positive control). The 30% hydrogen peroxide associated with the sodium perborate was left in the pulp chamber for 24 h. The specimens were immersed in a test tube containing a solution of potassium chromate (yellow), which turns blue in the presence ofhydrogen peroxide. Two calibrated evaluators scored according to color in the presence of the detecting solution (0 - unaltered color, 1 - light blue and 2 - dark blue). Data were analyzed by the Kruskall-Wallis test (p<0.05). The results showed no statistically significant differences between the experimental group G3 and positive control (G5). No statistically significant difference was observed between G1 and G3. However a statistical difference was verified between G2 and G3. MTA presented higher sealing ability than Vidrion R and did not differ from the positive control. However there was no difference between MTA and Coltosol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms