Failure of retrospective revaluation to influence blocking

Abstract

In the blocking paradigm, subjects receive reinforced presentations of a compound, AX, after reinforced presentations of A alone. Following this training, responding to X is often diminished relative to a control group, which did not receive the prior training with A. Standard associative theories of learning such as the Rescorla-Wagner model (Rescorla & Wagner, 1972) explain this effect by assuming that A and X compete for control over behavior. In contrast, theories such as the comparator hypothesis assume that learning about X is unaffected by the properties of A, but it is the expression of this learning at test that is affected by the blocking manipulation. The aim of the 3 reported experiments was to distinguish between these 2 accounts. According to the comparator hypothesis, devaluing A following blocking should increase subsequent responding to X. In all 3 experiments the blocking effect was found to persist following devaluation of A, providing support for standard associative theories.