Infection in fracture fixation: can we influence infection rates through implant design?
- PMID: 19842017
- DOI: 10.1007/s10856-009-3907-x
Infection in fracture fixation: can we influence infection rates through implant design?
Abstract
Musculoskeletal infection is one of the most common complications associated with surgical fixation of bones fractured during trauma. These infections usually involve bacterial colonisation and biofilm formation on the fracture fixation device itself, as well as infection of the surrounding tissues. Antibiotic prophylaxis, wound debridement and postsurgical care can reduce the incidence of, but do not prevent, these infections. Much research and development has been focussed on ways to further reduce the incidence of infection and in the following short review we describe our experiences investigating the contribution of the basic design of fracture fixation devices on the susceptibility to infection. It has been shown in animal studies that device size, shape, mode of action and material and topography play an interrelated role in the susceptibility to infection. Although direct extrapolation from animal studies to the clinical setting is difficult, close consideration of the design factors that can reduce the incidence of infection in animal models is expected to help minimise the incidence of infection associated with any clinically implemented fracture fixation device.
Similar articles
-
Pathophysiology of infections after internal fixation of fractures.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000 Sep-Oct;8(5):285-91. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200009000-00002. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000. PMID: 11029556 Review.
-
Surgical aspects of infection involving osteosynthesis implants: implant design and resistance to local infection.Injury. 2006 May;37 Suppl 2:S67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.011. Injury. 2006. PMID: 16651074
-
Staphylococci and implant surfaces: a review.Injury. 2006 May;37 Suppl 2:S3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.003. Injury. 2006. PMID: 16651069 Review.
-
Recommendations for bone and joint prosthetic device infections in clinical practice (prosthesis, implants, osteosynthesis). Société de Pathologie Infectieuse de Langue Française.Med Mal Infect. 2010 Apr;40(4):185-211. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2009.12.009. Epub 2010 Mar 19. Med Mal Infect. 2010. PMID: 20303685 No abstract available.
-
[Is routine implant removal after trauma surgery sensible?].Unfallchirurg. 2012 Apr;115(4):315-22. doi: 10.1007/s00113-012-2159-2. Unfallchirurg. 2012. PMID: 22476340 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Novel Zinc / Tungsten Carbide Nanocomposite as Bioabsorbable Implant.Mater Lett. 2020 Mar 15;263:127282. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.127282. Epub 2019 Dec 28. Mater Lett. 2020. PMID: 32647402 Free PMC article.
-
Functionalization of TiO2 for Better Performance as Orthopedic Implants.Materials (Basel). 2022 Oct 3;15(19):6868. doi: 10.3390/ma15196868. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36234208 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The future of biologic coatings for orthopaedic implants.Biomaterials. 2013 Apr;34(13):3174-83. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.074. Epub 2013 Feb 4. Biomaterials. 2013. PMID: 23391496 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Optimal culture incubation time in orthopedic device-associated infections: a retrospective analysis of prolonged 14-day incubation.J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Jan;52(1):61-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01766-13. Epub 2013 Oct 23. J Clin Microbiol. 2014. PMID: 24153117 Free PMC article.
-
Microbial Colonization of Explants after Osteosynthesis in Small Animals: Incidence and Influencing Factors.Vet Sci. 2024 May 16;11(5):221. doi: 10.3390/vetsci11050221. Vet Sci. 2024. PMID: 38787193 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources