Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield
- PMID: 1984295
- DOI: 10.1148/radiology.178.1.1984295
Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield
Abstract
All recommendations for mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions seen at mammography during a 6-month period were reviewed to establish compliance rate and eventual outcome. One hundred forty-four of 2,650 mammograms (5%) showed minimal abnormalities that warranted short-term and periodic mammographic follow-up. Rates of compliance at 4 months and at 1, 2, and 3 years were 88%, 71%, 60%, and 47%, respectively. Progressive mammographic change was found in 10 patients, only one of whom had a carcinoma. It was concluded that mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions is a reasonable alternative to surgical biopsy, although patient compliance remains a significant problem.
Similar articles
-
Patient compliance and diagnostic yield of 18-month unilateral follow-up in surveillance of probably benign mammographic lesions.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Apr;202(4):922-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11137. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014. PMID: 24660725
-
Compliance with recommended follow-up after fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: a retrospective study.Radiology. 1996 Oct;201(1):71-4. doi: 10.1148/radiology.201.1.8816523. Radiology. 1996. PMID: 8816523
-
Rate of compliance with recommendations for additional mammographic views and biopsies.Radiology. 1991 Nov;181(2):359-61. doi: 10.1148/radiology.181.2.1924772. Radiology. 1991. PMID: 1924772
-
Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1989 Dec;3(4):611-40. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1989. PMID: 2691492 Review.
-
Benign circumscribed breast masses. Mammographic and sonographic appearance.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1994 Sep;21(3):519-37. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1994. PMID: 7816411 Review.
Cited by
-
Validation of results from knowledge discovery: mass density as a predictor of breast cancer.J Digit Imaging. 2010 Oct;23(5):554-61. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9235-3. Epub 2009 Sep 16. J Digit Imaging. 2010. PMID: 19760292 Free PMC article.
-
Timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;40(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/BF01806002. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996. PMID: 8888152
-
Frequency of malignancy seen in probably benign lesions at contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: findings from ACRIN 6667.Radiology. 2010 Jun;255(3):731-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10081712. Radiology. 2010. PMID: 20501712 Free PMC article.
-
Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of breast imaging in the detection of cancer.Br J Cancer. 1997;76(3):377-81. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.393. Br J Cancer. 1997. PMID: 9252206 Free PMC article.
-
[Evaluation of the results after using of the BI-RADS categories in 1,777 clinical mammograms].Radiologe. 2008 Mar;48(3):281-8. doi: 10.1007/s00117-007-1474-z. Radiologe. 2008. PMID: 17265008 German.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical