Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov;193(5):1340-5.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2886.

Dose to radiosensitive organs during routine chest CT: effects of tube current modulation

Affiliations

Dose to radiosensitive organs during routine chest CT: effects of tube current modulation

Erin Angel et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: The aims of this study were to estimate the dose to radiosensitive organs (glandular breast and lung) in patients of various sizes undergoing routine chest CT examinations with and without tube current modulation; to quantify the effect of tube current modulation on organ dose; and to investigate the relation between patient size and organ dose to breast and lung resulting from chest CT examinations.

Materials and methods: Thirty voxelized models generated from images of patients were extended to include lung contours and were used to represent a cohort of women of various sizes. Monte Carlo simulation-based virtual MDCT scanners had been used in a previous study to estimate breast dose from simulations of a fixed-tube-current and a tube current-modulated chest CT examinations of each patient model. In this study, lung doses were estimated for each simulated examination, and the percentage organ dose reduction attributed to tube current modulation was correlated with patient size for both glandular breast and lung tissues.

Results: The average radiation dose to lung tissue from a chest CT scan obtained with fixed tube current was 23 mGy. The use of tube current modulation reduced the lung dose an average of 16%. Reductions in organ dose (up to 56% for lung) due to tube current modulation were more substantial among smaller patients than larger. For some larger patients, use of tube current modulation for chest CT resulted in an increase in organ dose to the lung as high as 33%. For chest CT, lung dose and breast dose estimates had similar correlations with patient size. On average the two organs receive approximately the same dose effects from tube current modulation.

Conclusion: The dose to radiosensitive organs during fixed-tube-current and tube current-modulated chest CT can be estimated on the basis of patient size. Organ dose generally decreases with the use of tube current-modulated acquisition, but patient size can directly affect the dose reduction achieved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
28-year-old woman undergoing tube current modulated chest CT. Plot shows patient's tube current modulation scheme overlaid on sagittal view of patient. Tube current versus table location is shown for patient model with perimeter of 101 cm.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Graph of results for fixed-tube-current chest CT examination shows correlation between patient perimeter and radiation dose to glandular breast (diamonds) (R2 = 0.76) and lung (circles) (R2 = 0.77).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Graph of results for tube current–modulated chest CT examination shows correlation between patient perimeter and radiation dose to glandular breast (diamonds) (R2 = 0.46) and lung (circles) (R2 = 0.31).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Graph shows correlation between patient perimeter and percentage reduction or increase in dose to glandular breast (R2 = 0.81) and lung (R2 = 0.82) with use of tube current modulation as opposed to fixed tube current in chest CT. Negative percentage dose reduction value denotes increase in organ dose with use of tube current modulation as opposed to fixed tube current.

References

    1. Mettler FA, Jr, Thomadsen BR, Bhargavan M, et al. Medical radiation exposure in the U.S. in 2006: preliminary results. Health Phys. 2008;95:502–507. - PubMed
    1. Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi TT, Reiman RE, et al. Radiation dose to the female breast from 16-MDCT body protocols. AJR. 2006;186:1718–1722. - PubMed
    1. Mayo JR, Aldrich J, Muller NL. Radiation exposure at chest CT: a statement of the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2003;228:15–21. - PubMed
    1. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332. No authors listed. - PubMed
    1. Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–1998. Radiat Res. 2007;168:1–64. - PubMed

Publication types