Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Nov-Dec;29(6):429-32.
doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.57163.

A prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing bipolar plasma kinetic resection of the prostate versus conventional monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing bipolar plasma kinetic resection of the prostate versus conventional monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Christopher Ho Chee Kong et al. Ann Saudi Med. 2009 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background and objective: For treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), Plasma Kinetic loop Resection of the Prostate (PKRP) is an alternative to conventional monopolar transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). We compared outcomes with the two treatments in a randomized trial.

Patients and methods: Over a one-year period, we randomly assigned patients with an indication for surgery for BPH and who met inclusion criteria to treatment with either PKRP or TURP. We measured prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound, relief of bladder outlet obstruction, operative time, decline in serum sodium and hemoglobin, weight of resected prostatic chips, duration of catheterization and hospital stay. Patients were evaluated one month after discharge for obstructive symptoms. Complications were also recorded.

Results: Of 102 patients enrolled, 51 underwent PKRP and 51 underwent TURP. Relief of obstructive symptoms and mean operative time showed no statistically significant difference. The PKRP group had a smaller decline in hemoglobin than the TURP group (0.6 g/dL vs 1.8 g/dL, P=.01), a lower reduction in serum sodium levels (1.03 mmol/L vs 5.01 mmol/L, P=.01), a shorter catheterization time (37.2 hours versus 57.7 hours, P=.03) and a shorter hospital stay (1.5 days versus 2.6 days, P=.02). One patient in the bipolar PKRP group needed recatheterization versus four patients in the TURP group.

Conclusion: PKRP reduces morbidity with an outcome similar to conventional monopolar TURP in the treatment of BPH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation between transurethral ultrasound prostate volume (mL) and prostatic chip weight resected (g).

References

    1. Hamadeh MY, Madan S, Singh M, Philip T. A 3-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2000;86:648–51. - PubMed
    1. Fung BT, Li SK, Yu CF, Lau BE, Hou SS. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing plasmakinetic vaporesection and conventional Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. Asian J Surg. 2005;28:24–8. - PubMed
    1. Starkman JS, Richard A. Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: Shorter stay, earlier cathether removal and fewer complications. BJU Int. 2005;95:69–71. - PubMed
    1. Kaplan SA, Laor E, Fatal M, Alexis E. Transurethral resection of the prostate versus transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate: A blinded, prospective comparative study with 1-year follow-up. J Urol. 1998. pp. 454–8. - PubMed
    1. Sio MD, Autorino R, Quarto G, Diamano R, Perdoná S, di Lorenzo G. Gyrus bipolar versus standard monopolar resection of the prostate: A randomised prospective trial. Urology. 2005;67:69–72. - PubMed

Publication types