Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1991 Jan;20(1):31-5.
doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81114-x.

A prospective analysis of intramuscular meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine in pediatric emergency department patients

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A prospective analysis of intramuscular meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine in pediatric emergency department patients

T E Terndrup et al. Ann Emerg Med. 1991 Jan.

Abstract

Study objective: To examine physiologic responses and efficacy of 2, 1, and 1 mg/kg IM meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine (MPC), respectively, in children.

Design: Prospective, unblinded trial.

Setting: A university and community emergency department.

Patients: Sixty-three hemodynamically and neurologically stable children.

Intervention: Single dose of IM MPC.

Measurements and main results: Serial respirations, heart rate, arterial systolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and Glasgow Coma Scale were measured at 30-minute intervals. Effectiveness was assessed by two independent observers using separate visual analog scales for cooperation and sedation. Times to sleep (27 +/- 24 minutes), sitting upright (103 +/- 87 minutes), ED discharge (4.7 +/- 2.4 hours), eating (11 +/- 7.9 hours), and normal behavior (19 +/- 15 hours) were acceptable. Minor, but statistically significant, changes in respiration rate (-1.9 +/- 0.4), heart rate (+4.5 +/- 1.8), oxygen saturation (-0.7 +/- 0.3%), and Glasgow Coma Scale (-2.5 +/- 0.6) occurred for 120 minutes after MPC. No serious complications or resuscitation were required. Mean visual analog scale scores were 5.0/10.4 or more in 71% of cases, with interobserver agreement very good (cooperation, r = .79; effectiveness, r = .80). Twenty-nine percent of children were judged insufficiently sedated.

Conclusion: IM MPC is a safe and generally effective agent for ED procedures in selected children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources