Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Sep;53(5):458-63.
doi: 10.1007/s10384-009-0712-5. Epub 2009 Oct 22.

Aspheric laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopia using the technolas 217z100: comparison of outcomes versus results from the conventional technique

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Aspheric laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopia using the technolas 217z100: comparison of outcomes versus results from the conventional technique

Akihito Igarashi et al. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare postoperative outcomes of a new aspheric laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) system, which applies an index for corneal asphericity (Q-value), with outcomes of the conventional LASIK procedure.

Methods: Twenty-eight eyes of 15 consecutive patients (mean age, 36.4 +/- 5.8 years) underwent aspheric LASIK (As-LASIK group), and 33 eyes of 18 consecutive patients (mean age, 32.9 +/- 8.3 years) underwent conventional LASIK (Con-LASIK group) at Sanno Hospital (Tokyo, Japan). Both procedures were performed with a Moria LSK-One microkeratome and a Bausch and Lomb Technolas 217-z100 excimer laser. Preoperative mean spherical equivalent refraction values were -5.13 +/- 1.23 diopters (D) and -5.63 +/- 0.88 D in the As-LASIK and Con-LASIK groups, respectively. Higher order aberrations were measured and contrast sensitivity was assessed at 3 months after the procedure, and these, along with safety, efficacy, and predictability, were compared between the two procedures.

Results: Conventional LASIK significantly increased higher order aberrations and reduced contrast sensitivity, whereas As-LASIK did not increase spherical-like aberrations or alter contrast sensitivity.

Conclusions: Aspheric LASIK may be a better laser technique than Con-LASIK, with less postoperative increase in spherical-like aberrations and better control over contrast sensitivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19 Suppl:155-65 - PubMed
    1. J Refract Surg. 2001 Nov-Dec;17(6):658-69 - PubMed
    1. J Refract Surg. 2006 Jun;22(6):546-55 - PubMed
    1. Lasers Surg Med. 1990;10(5):463-8 - PubMed
    1. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Feb;33(2):191-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources