Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb;11(2):93-7.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0032.

Preventing hypoglycemia using predictive alarm algorithms and insulin pump suspension

Affiliations

Preventing hypoglycemia using predictive alarm algorithms and insulin pump suspension

Bruce Buckingham et al. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Nocturnal hypoglycemia is a significant problem. From 50% to 75% of hypoglycemia seizures occur at night. Despite the development of real-time glucose sensors (real-time continuous glucose monitor [CGM]) with hypoglycemic alarms, many patients sleep through these alarms. The goal of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility using a real-time CGM to discontinue insulin pump therapy when hypoglycemia was predicted.

Methods: Twenty-two subjects with type 1 diabetes had two daytime admissions to a clinical research center. On the first admission their basal insulin was increased until their blood glucose level was <60 mg/dL. On the second admission hypoglycemic prediction algorithms were tested to determine if hypoglycemia was prevented by a 90-min pump shutoff and to determine if the pump shutoff resulted in rebound hyperglycemia.

Results: Using a statistical prediction algorithm with an 80 mg/dL threshold and a 30-min projection horizon, hypoglycemia was prevented 60% of the time. Using a linear prediction algorithm with an 80 mg/dL threshold and a 45-min prediction horizon, hypoglycemia was prevented 80% of the time. There was no rebound hyperglycemia following pump suspension.

Conclusions: Further development of algorithms is needed to prevent all episodes of hypoglycemia from occurring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Graph of results from a first admission.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Second admission with pump shutoff on projected alarm.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Rate of change of glucose levels following pump shutoff.

References

    1. Wilson DM. Beck RW. Tamborlane WV. Dontchev MJ. Kollman C. Chase P. Fox LA. Ruedy KJ. Tsalikian E. Weinzimer SA DirecNet Study Group. The accuracy of the FreeStyle Navigator continuous glucose monitoring system in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:59–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weinzimer SA. Steil GM. Swan KL. Dziura J. Kurtz N. Tamborlane WV. Fully automated closed-loop insulin delivery versus semi-automated hybrid control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes using an artificial pancreas. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:934–939. - PubMed
    1. Steil GM. Rebrin K. Darwin C. Hariri F. Saad MF. Feasibility of automating insulin delivery for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2006;55:3344–3350. - PubMed
    1. Cryer PE. Hypoglycemia is the limiting factor in the management of diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 1999;15:42–46. - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Adverse events and their association with treatment regimens in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:1415–1427. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms