Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and mortality in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 19850156
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.10.010
Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and mortality in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background & aims: As the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and mortality in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) are important determinants of the potential yield and cost-effectiveness of BE surveillance, clarification of these factors is essential. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the incidence of EAC and mortality due to EAC in BE under surveillance.
Methods: Databases were searched for relevant cohort studies in English language that reported EAC risk and mortality due to EAC in BE. Studies had to include patients with histologically proven BE, documented follow-up, and histologically proven EAC on surveillance. A random effects model was used with assessment of heterogeneity by the I(2)-statistic and of publication bias by Begg's and Egger's tests.
Results: Fifty-one studies were included in the main analysis. The overall mean age of BE patients was 61 years; the mean overall proportion of males was 64%. The pooled estimate for EAC incidence was 6.3/1000 person-years of follow-up (95% confidence interval, 4.7-8.4) with considerable heterogeneity (P < .001; I(2) = 79%). Nineteen studies reported data on mortality due to EAC. The pooled incidence of fatal EAC was 3.0/1000 person-years of follow-up (95% confidence interval, 2.2-3.9) with no evidence for heterogeneity (P = .4; I(2) = 7%). No evidence of publication bias was found.
Conclusions: Patients with BE are at low risk of malignant progression and predominantly die due to causes other than EAC. This undermines the cost-effectiveness of BE surveillance and supports the search for valid risk stratification tools to identify the minority of patients that are likely to benefit from surveillance.
Copyright 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Risk and reason in Barrett's esophagus.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Mar;8(3):233-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.12.007. Epub 2009 Dec 16. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010. PMID: 20026254 No abstract available.
-
The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma among patients with nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus has been overestimated.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Apr;9(4):363-4; author reply 364-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.11.009. Epub 2010 Nov 27. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011. PMID: 21115135 No abstract available.
-
Population-based estimates of cancer and mortality in Barrett's esophagus: implications for the future.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Sep;9(9):723-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.05.025. Epub 2011 Jun 6. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011. PMID: 21683805 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
