Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;72(2):228-37.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.09.007. Epub 2009 Oct 21.

Evidence for specificity of ERP abnormalities during response inhibition in ADHD children: a comparison with reading disorder children without ADHD

Affiliations

Evidence for specificity of ERP abnormalities during response inhibition in ADHD children: a comparison with reading disorder children without ADHD

Mario Liotti et al. Brain Cogn. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Executive function and working memory deficits are not only present in ADHD, but also in reading disorder (RD). Here, high-density ERPs were recorded during the Stop Signal Task in 53 children and adolescents: An ADHD-combined type group, a group with RD, and a healthy control group. The ADHD-C group displayed unique abnormalities of the frontal N200. Both healthy controls and RD groups showed a success-related right frontal N200 modulation, which was absent in the ADHD group. Second, for Success Inhibition trials, the ADHD-C had smaller right frontal N200 waves relative to healthy controls, while the RD group did not. In contrast, NoGo-P3 abnormalities were present both in the ADHD-C and RD groups. Impaired early response inhibition mechanisms, indexed by the frontal N200, appear to be limited to ADHD-C. In contrast, deficits in later cognitive control and error monitoring mechanisms, indexed by the NoGo-P3, appear to be present in both conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Grandaverage ERP waveforms time-locked to the Stop Signal for Successful Inhibitions (top) and Failed Inhibitions (bottom) at 20 representative scalp sites over frontal, central and parietal scalp sites for the Control Group (in purple), the ADHD Group (in green) and the Reading Disorder Group (in blue).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Topographic maps of the N200 wave (175-225 ms) to the Stop Signal for Successful Inhibitions (SI) illustrating the N200 group effects. Top: Scalp distribution of the N200 mean voltage amplitude in μV for the Control Group (Left), the ADHD Group (center) and the RD Group (right). Bottom: Scalp distribution of F-values in the contrast of Controls versus ADHD (left) and Controls versus RD (right). Maps are the result of omnibus F-tests at each scalp sensor, uncorrected for multiple comparisons. Note the presence of a significant right frontal N200 reduction in the ADHD group only.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Topographic maps of the NoGo-P3 to Failed Inhibitions (300-400 ms), illustrating the main NoGo-P3 group effects. Top: Scalp distribution of the NoGo-P3 mean voltage amplitude in μV for the Control Group (Left), the ADHD Group (center) and the RD Group (right). Bottom: Scalp distribution of F-values in the contrast of Controls versus ADHD (left) and Controls versus RD (right). Maps are the result of omnibus F-tests at each scalp sensor, uncorrected for multiple comparisons. Note significant fronto-central NoGO-P3 reductions in both ADHD and RD groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Top: NoGo-P3 Mean voltage amplitude of the NoGo-P3 (300-400 over frontocentral (anterior ROI) scalp for Successful Inhibitions (SI) and Failed Inhibitions (FI) over the left and right frontal ROI for the Control, ADHD and RD groups. *: p<0.05.

References

    1. Albrecht B, Banaschewski T, Brandeis D, Heinrich H, Rothenberger A. Response inhibition deficits in externalizing child psychiatric disorders: An ERP-study with the Stop-task. Behavior and Brain Function. 2005;9:1–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albrecht B, Brandeis D, Uebel H, Heinrich H, Müller UC, Hasselhorn M, Steinhausen HC, Rothenberger A, Banaschewski T. Action Monitoring in boys with ADHD, their Nonaffected Siblings and Normal Controls: Evidence for Conflict Monitoring as an Endophenotype for ADHD. Biological Psychiatry. 2008;64:615–625. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed (DSM-IV) Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
    1. Banaschewski T, Brandeis D, Heinrich H, Albrecht B, Brunner E, Rothenberger A. Association of ADHD and conduct disorder - brain electrical evidence for the existence of a distinct subtype. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2003;44:356–376. - PubMed
    1. Banaschewski T, Brandeis D, Heinrich H, Albrecht B, Brunner E, Rothenberger A. Questioning inhibitory control as the specific deficit of ADHD - evidence from brain electrical activity. Journal of Neural Transmission. 2004;111:841–864. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources