Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Nov-Dec;58(6):410-8.
doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181bee597.

Controlled trial of nursing interventions to improve health outcomes of older African American women with type 2 diabetes

Anne H Skelly  1 , John Carlson, Jennifer Leeman, April Soward, Dorothy Burns
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Controlled trial of nursing interventions to improve health outcomes of older African American women with type 2 diabetes

Anne H Skelly et al. Nurs Res. 2009 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes affects one in five African American women older than 60 years. These women face distinct challenges in managing diabetes self-care. Therefore, tailored self-care interventions for this population need to be developed and tested.

Objectives: The effectiveness of a tailored, four-visit, in-home symptom-focused diabetes intervention with and without booster telephone calls was compared with an attentional control focused on skills training for weight management and diet.

Methods: African American women (n = 180; >55 years old, Type 2 diabetes mellitus >1 year, HbA1c >7%) were randomly assigned to the intervention or attentional control condition. Half the intervention participants were assigned to also receive a telephone-delivered booster intervention. Participants were evaluated at baseline and 3, 6, and 9 months.

Results: : Baseline HbA1 was 8.3 in the intervention group (n = 60), 8.29 in the intervention with booster group (n = 55), and 8.44 in the attentional control condition (n = 59). HbA1c declined significantly in the whole sample (0.57%) with no differences between study arms. Participants in the booster arm decreased HbA1c by 0.76%. Symptom distress, perceived quality of life, impact of diabetes, and self-care activities also improved significantly for the whole sample with no significant differences between study arms.

Discussion: Parsimonious interventions of four in-person visits yielded clinically significant decreases in HbA1c. Although the weight and diet program was intended as an attentional control, the positive effects suggest it met a need in this population. Because the contents of both the intervention and the attentional control were effective despite different approaches, a revised symptom-focused intervention that incorporates weight and diet skills training may offer even better results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Participants Enrolled
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mean HbA1c at Each Data Collection Point, by Treatment
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. Transaction on Automatic Control. 1974;AC-19:717–723.
    1. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes 4-1-1 facts, figures & statistics at a glance: Who's getting diagnosed, why and what it means for society. Alexandria, VA: Author; 2005.
    1. American Diabetes Association. Clinical practice recommendations 2008. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:S1–S108. - PubMed
    1. Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Nwankwo R, Gillard ML, Oh M, Fitzgerald JT. Evaluating a problem-based empowerment program for African Americans with diabetes: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Ethnicity & Disease. 2005;15(4):671–678. - PubMed
    1. Becker H, Roberts G, Voelmeck W. Explanations for improvement in both experimental and control groups. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2003;25(6):746–755. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances