Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct 23:9:194.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-194.

Characteristics of national registries for occupational diseases: international development and validation of an audit tool (ODIT)

Dick Spreeuwers  1 , Angela G E M de Boer, Jos H A M Verbeek, Frank J H van Dijk
Affiliations

Characteristics of national registries for occupational diseases: international development and validation of an audit tool (ODIT)

Dick Spreeuwers et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to develop quality indicators that can be used for quality assessment of registries of occupational diseases in relation to preventive policy on a national level. The research questions were: 1. Which indicators determine the quality of national registries of occupational diseases with respect to their ability to provide appropriate information for preventive policy? 2. What are the criteria that can distinguish low quality from high quality?

Methods: First, we performed a literature search to assess which output of registries can be considered appropriate for preventive policy and to develop a set of preliminary indicators and criteria. Second, final indicators and criteria were assessed and their content validity was tested in a Delphi study, for which experts from the 25 EU Member States were invited.

Results: The literature search revealed two different types of information output to be appropriate for preventive policy: monitor and alert information. For the evaluation of the quality of the monitor and alert function we developed ten indicators and criteria. Sixteen of the twenty-five experts responded in the first round of the Delphi study, and eleven in the second round. Based on their comments, we assessed the final nine indicators: the completeness of the notification form, coverage of registration, guidelines or criteria for notification, education and training of reporting physicians, completeness of registration, statistical methods used, investigation of special cases, presentation of monitor information, and presentation of alert information. Except for the indicator "coverage of registration" for the alert function, all the indicators met the preset requirements of content validity.

Conclusion: We have developed quality indicators and criteria to evaluate registries for occupational diseases on the ability to provide appropriate information for preventive policy on a national level. Together, these indicators form a tool which can be used for quality improvement of registries of occupational diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Registry for occupational diseases and quality indicators: a model.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fingerhut M, Driscoll T, Nelson DI, Concha-Barrientos M, Punnett L, Pruss-Ustin A, Steenland K, Leigh J, Corvalan C. Contribution of occupational risks factors to the global burden of disease - a summary of findings. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health Supplements. 2005;1:58–61.
    1. Nelson DI. The Global Burden of Selected Occupational Diseases and Injury Risks: Methodology and Summary. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48:400–418. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20211. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dembe AE. The social consequences of occupational injuries and illnesses. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40:403–417. doi: 10.1002/ajim.1113. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weil D. Valuing the economic consequences of work injury and illness: a comparison of methods and findings. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40:418–437. doi: 10.1002/ajim.1114. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leigh JP, Waehrer G, Miller TD, Keenan C. Cost of occupational injuries and illness across industries. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004;30:199–205. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms