Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Nov 20;27(33):5660-9.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9022. Epub 2009 Oct 26.

Consensus report of the national cancer institute clinical trials planning meeting on pancreas cancer treatment

Affiliations
Review

Consensus report of the national cancer institute clinical trials planning meeting on pancreas cancer treatment

Philip A Philip et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality, despite significant improvements in diagnostic imaging and operative mortality rates. The 5-year survival rate remains less than 5% because of microscopic or gross metastatic disease at time of diagnosis. The Clinical Trials Planning Meeting in pancreatic cancer was convened by the National Cancer Institute's Gastrointestinal Cancer Steering Committee to discuss the integration of basic and clinical knowledge in the design of clinical trials in PDAC. Major emphasis was placed on the enhancement of research to identify and validate the relevant targets and molecular pathways in PDAC, cancer stem cells, and the microenvironment. Emphasis was also placed on developing rational combinations of targeted agents and the development of predictive biomarkers to assist selection of patient subsets. The development of preclinical tumor models that are better predictive of human PDAC must be supported with wider availability to the research community. Phase III clinical trials should be implemented only if there is a meaningful clinical signal of efficacy and safety in the phase II setting. The emphasis must therefore be on performing well-designed phase II studies with uniform sets of basic entry and evaluation criteria with survival as a primary endpoint. Patients with either metastatic or locally advanced PDAC must be studied separately.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Comment in

References

    1. Jemal A Siegel R Ward E, etal: Cancer Statistics, 2008 CA Cancer J Clin 58:71–96,2008 - PubMed
    1. Burris HA III Moore MJ Andersen J, etal: Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial J Clin Oncol 15:2403–2413,1997 - PubMed
    1. Rothenberg M Moore MJ Cripps MC, etal: A phase II trial of gemcitabine in patients with 5-FU-refractory pancreas cancer Ann Oncol 7:347–353,1996 - PubMed
    1. Desai SP, Zalupski MM: Lowy AM, Leach SD, Philip PA.Optimum cytotoxic therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer Pancreatic Cancer 511–534,2008. New York, NY: Springer
    1. Moore MJ Goldstein D Hamm J, etal: Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group J Clin Oncol 25:1960–1966,2007 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms