Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;117(1):105-22.
doi: 10.1007/s00702-009-0333-7. Epub 2009 Oct 27.

Cognitive effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review

Affiliations

Cognitive effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review

Birgit Guse et al. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was introduced as a non-invasive tool for the investigation of the motor cortex. The repetitive application (rTMS), causing longer lasting effects, was used to study the influence on a variety of cerebral functions. High-frequency (>1 Hz) rTMS is known to depolarize neurons under the stimulating coil and to indirectly affect areas being connected and related to emotion and behavior. Researchers found selective cognitive improvement after high-frequency (HF) stimulation specifically over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). This article provides a systematic review of HF-rTMS studies (1999-2009) stimulating over the prefrontal cortex of patients suffering from psychiatric/neurological diseases or healthy volunteers, where the effects on cognitive functions were measured. The cognitive effect was analyzed with regard to the impact of clinical status (patients/healthy volunteers) and stimulation type (verum/sham). RTMS at 10, 15 or 20 Hz, applied over the left DLPFC, within a range of 10-15 successive sessions and an individual motor threshold of 80-110%, is most likely to cause significant cognitive improvement. In comparison, patients tend to reach a greater improvement than healthy participants. Limitations concern the absence of healthy groups in clinical studies and partly the absence of sham groups. Thus, future investigations are needed to assess cognitive rTMS effects in different psychiatric disorders versus healthy subjects using an extended standardized neuropsychological test battery. Since the pathophysiological and neurobiological basis of cognitive improvement with rTMS remains unclear, additional studies including genetics, experimental neurophysiology and functional brain imaging are necessary to explore stimulation-related functional changes in the brain.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Avery DH, Hotzheimer PE, Fawaz W, Russo J, Neumaier J, Dunner DL, Haynor DR, Claypoole KH, Wajdik C, Roy-Byrne P. A controlled study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in medication-resistant major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;59:187–194. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex (letter) Lancet. 1985;1:1106–1107. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92413-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ben-Shachar D, Belmaker RH, Grisaru N, Klein E. Transcranial magnetic stimulation induces alternations in brain monoamines. J Neural Transm. 1997;104:191–197. doi: 10.1007/BF01273180. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boggio PS, Fregni F, Bermpohl F, Mansur CG, Rosa M, Rumi DO, Barbosa ER, Rosa MO, Pascual-Leone A, Rigonatti SP, Marcolin MA, Silva MTA. Effect of repetitive TMS and fluoxetine on cognitive function in patients with Parkinson’s disease and concurrent depression. Brief reports. Mov Disord. 2005;20(9):1178–1219. doi: 10.1002/mds.20508. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burt T, Lisanby SH, Sackheim HA. Neuropsychiatric applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation: a meta analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2002;5:73–103. doi: 10.1017/S1461145702002791. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms