Goal-directed fluid management with trans-oesophageal Doppler
- PMID: 19862891
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2009.03.001
Goal-directed fluid management with trans-oesophageal Doppler
Abstract
Major surgery is associated with significant trauma and is a potential cause of multiple system organ failure and death. Measurement of cardiac output using a variety of techniques during the perioperative period has enabled practitioners to proactively optimise stroke volume and cardiac output in an attempt to reduce postoperative complications. Although pulmonary artery catheter has been widely used and considered as the gold standard for measuring cardiac output, recent advancement of technology has seen the development of a number of less-invasive haemodynamic monitors. Oesophageal Doppler ultrasonography is a minimally invasive method for measuring stroke volume and cardiac output. It is user-friendly and is one of the few low-invasive technologies to date, which has been used successfully to guide intra-operative fluid administration, resulting in improvement in outcome and significant reduction in duration of hospital stay.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of noninvasive bioreactance with oesophageal Doppler estimation of stroke volume during open abdominal surgery: an observational study.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Aug;30(8):501-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283603250. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013. PMID: 23549128
-
A randomised controlled trial of fluid restriction compared to oesophageal Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy in elective major colorectal surgery within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program.Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014 Nov;42(6):752-60. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1404200611. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014. PMID: 25342408 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of fluid strategy on stroke volume, cardiac output, and fluid responsiveness in adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a sub-study of the Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy in Major Abdominal Surgery (RELIEF) trial.Br J Anaesth. 2021 Apr;126(4):818-825. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Feb 23. Br J Anaesth. 2021. PMID: 33632521 Clinical Trial.
-
Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring in the perioperative setting.Anesth Analg. 2009 Mar;108(3):887-97. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818ffd99. Anesth Analg. 2009. PMID: 19224798 Review.
-
[Haemodynamic monitoring in the perioperative phase. Available systems, practical application and clinical data].Anaesthesist. 2009 Aug;58(8):764-78, 780-6. doi: 10.1007/s00101-009-1590-4. Anaesthesist. 2009. PMID: 19669105 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Perioperative fluid therapy: How much is not too much?Indian J Anaesth. 2012 Jul;56(4):323-5. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.100810. Indian J Anaesth. 2012. PMID: 23087452 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Perioperative fluid restriction.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013 Sep;26(3):197-202. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351139. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013. PMID: 24436675 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Non-Invasive Wearable Patch Utilizing Seismocardiography for Peri-Operative Use in Surgical Patients.IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 May;25(5):1572-1582. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.3032938. Epub 2021 May 11. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021. PMID: 33090962 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical review: Does it matter which hemodynamic monitoring system is used?Crit Care. 2013 Mar 5;17(2):208. doi: 10.1186/cc11814. Crit Care. 2013. PMID: 23672729 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Could the Use of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy be an Incentive for Live Kidney Donation?Cureus. 2016 Nov 22;8(11):e889. doi: 10.7759/cureus.889. Cureus. 2016. PMID: 28018759 Free PMC article.